Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(linting): update ESLint setup #10909

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jcfranco
Copy link
Member

@jcfranco jcfranco commented Nov 27, 2024

Related Issue: N/A

Summary

After #10884, we need a few more tweaks for linting to run properly.

Additional notes

  • The following rules have been set to warn or removed until they can be fixed separately:
    • ban-types (removed) – split into separate rules.
    • @typescript-eslint/no-empty-object-type (warns)
    • @typescript-eslint/no-unused-expressions (warns)
    • @typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars (warns)
    • no-constant-binary-expression (warns)
    • lines-between-class-members (removed) – moved to @stylistic
  • Installs cross-env per ESLint documentation. We can remove after migrating our configs to the recommended flat structure.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the chore Issues with changes that don't modify src or test files. label Nov 27, 2024
@jcfranco jcfranco added the skip visual snapshots Pull requests that do not need visual regression testing. label Nov 27, 2024
@jcfranco jcfranco merged commit cb9d85b into dev Nov 27, 2024
14 checks passed
@jcfranco jcfranco deleted the jcfranco/update-eslint-setup branch November 27, 2024 19:08
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 2024-12-17 - Dec Milestone milestone Nov 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
chore Issues with changes that don't modify src or test files. skip visual snapshots Pull requests that do not need visual regression testing.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants