Update the nav elements active status using Pathname

[Muhammad-Owais-Warsi]

Fixes Issue Closes #17

Changes proposed

• Used usePathname to get the current path.
• Using that current path , I update the tailwind dynamically.

Check List (Check all the applicable boxes)

• My code follows the code style of this project.
• My change requires changes to the documentation.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• All new and existing tests passed.
• This PR does not contain plagiarized content.
• The title of my pull request is a short description of the requested changes.

Screenshots

[eddiejaoude]

Thank you for the contribution 👍

Why is there "use client" everywhere?

[Muhammad-Owais-Warsi]

@eddiejaoude on removing the use client from those places raise errors. Like Object.groupBy is not a function etc..

[eddiejaoude]

Please go through and check your changes, "use client" should not be required. I would recommend checking your local node version as this might be causing the problem.

[Muhammad-Owais-Warsi]

@eddiejaoude please review and let me know if any changes required.

[eddiejaoude]

@Muhammad-Owais-Warsi please recheck each of your changes and make sure you are happy with them, because there are so many unnecessary changes

[Muhammad-Owais-Warsi]

@eddiejaoude to me it seems to be fine.

[eddiejaoude]

I will comment a few examples in line

[eddiejaoude]

I don't think this change is required?

[eddiejaoude]

Thank you for making further changes, but more are still required. I have left some example inline comments

Please recheck that all changes in your PR are changes you are happy with, such as extra line changes resulting in files being included in your PR that should not be

[Muhammad-Owais-Warsi]

Thank you for making further changes, but more are still required. I have left some example inline comments

Please recheck that all changes in your PR are changes you are happy with, such as extra line changes resulting in files being included in your PR that should not be

Sorry for the inconvenience, I'll recheck and let you know.

[Muhammad-Owais-Warsi]

@eddiejaoude Please review , I don't think anything should cause any problem now

[eddiejaoude]

Thank you for your contribution. As there were still unnecessary changes this PR could not be merge, and now as there are conflicts also, I have made a PR to solve this issue #43, so I will close this PR.

Hopefully my PR will highlight the changes required, for example the existing condition was the main change only required
https://github.com/EddieHubCommunity/HealthCheck/pull/43/files#diff-6a1559e4b25e80b6a3b7c9c6b7d24db73177617ee8efbc935fae6fd8a59d1667R170

[Muhammad-Owais-Warsi]

Thanks @eddiejaoude , will try to improve next time

[eddiejaoude]

Thanks @Muhammad-Owais-Warsi for the collaboration