Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ISSUE-282 Initial trial editing matrFacility with specific mining concepts #283

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
32 changes: 32 additions & 0 deletions src/matrFacility.ttl
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -147,6 +147,38 @@ somaf:Mine rdf:type owl:Class ;
rdfs:label "mine"@en .


### http://sweetontology.net/matrFacility/Adit
somaf:Mine rdf:type owl:Class ;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be somaf:Adit

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's not how we had this classified on our end, but I tend to agree. I was looking at the rest of this that comes from the USMIN source (with reference back to the AGI dictionary).

rdfs:subClassOf somaf:MiningFacility ;
rdfs:label "adit"@en ;
skos:definition "A horizontal or inclined tunnel driven from the surface for exploration, extracting ore or for dewatering a mine; also referred to as a tunnel or prospect tunnel"@en ;
prov:wasDerivedFrom "ISBN 0-922152-36-5" .


### http://sweetontology.net/matrFacility/BorrowPit
somaf:Mine rdf:type owl:Class ;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be somaf:BorrowPit

rdfs:subClassOf somaf:MiningFacility ;
rdfs:label "borrow pit"@en ;
skos:definition "An area where materials including soil, clay, sand, or gravel have been excavated for use in construction at another location"@en ;
prov:wasDerivedFrom "ISBN 0-922152-36-5" .


### http://sweetontology.net/matrFacility/Quarry
somaf:Mine rdf:type owl:Class ;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be somaf:Quarry

rdfs:subClassOf somaf:MiningFacility ;
rdfs:label "quarry"@en ;
skos:definition "An open or surface mineral excavation usually for the extraction of stone"@en ;
prov:wasDerivedFrom "ISBN 0-922152-36-5" .


### http://sweetontology.net/matrFacility/GypsumQuarry
somaf:Mine rdf:type owl:Class ;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be somaf:GypsumQuarry

rdfs:subClassOf somaf:Quarry ;
rdfs:label "gypsum quarry"@en ;
skos:definition "An open or surface mineral working for the purpose of extracting gypsum"@en ;
prov:wasDerivedFrom "ISBN 0-922152-36-5" .
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

prov:wasDerivedFrom has range prov:Entity, not obviously compatible with a string literal. Seems to me using something like dct:source would make more sense in this context.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great! Also what I was looking for. I'll look across SWEET further for dct:source. I'm interested to see how we are citing sources elsewhere. That reference piece seems to be missing quite a bit right now.

Speaking of a lack of source info, I was looking at SWEET's instantiation of minerals today in relation to how I'm working to bring Mindat minerals, along with the Strunz and Dana classifications, into our knowledge graph. Seems like an area maybe SWEET should cede territory to a domain group, focusing on perhaps clarifying higher level classes that help domains de/re-contextualize?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree, SWEET should just bridge to a mineral domain ontology (didn't @smrgeoinfo create one?) as per @skybristol 's comment above.



### http://sweetontology.net/matrFacility/MiningFacility
somaf:MiningFacility rdf:type owl:Class ;
rdfs:subClassOf somaf:Facility ;
Expand Down