-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ISSUE-282 Initial trial editing matrFacility with specific mining concepts #283
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -147,6 +147,38 @@ somaf:Mine rdf:type owl:Class ; | |
rdfs:label "mine"@en . | ||
|
||
|
||
### http://sweetontology.net/matrFacility/Adit | ||
somaf:Mine rdf:type owl:Class ; | ||
rdfs:subClassOf somaf:MiningFacility ; | ||
rdfs:label "adit"@en ; | ||
skos:definition "A horizontal or inclined tunnel driven from the surface for exploration, extracting ore or for dewatering a mine; also referred to as a tunnel or prospect tunnel"@en ; | ||
prov:wasDerivedFrom "ISBN 0-922152-36-5" . | ||
|
||
|
||
### http://sweetontology.net/matrFacility/BorrowPit | ||
somaf:Mine rdf:type owl:Class ; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. should be somaf:BorrowPit |
||
rdfs:subClassOf somaf:MiningFacility ; | ||
rdfs:label "borrow pit"@en ; | ||
skos:definition "An area where materials including soil, clay, sand, or gravel have been excavated for use in construction at another location"@en ; | ||
prov:wasDerivedFrom "ISBN 0-922152-36-5" . | ||
|
||
|
||
### http://sweetontology.net/matrFacility/Quarry | ||
somaf:Mine rdf:type owl:Class ; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. should be somaf:Quarry |
||
rdfs:subClassOf somaf:MiningFacility ; | ||
rdfs:label "quarry"@en ; | ||
skos:definition "An open or surface mineral excavation usually for the extraction of stone"@en ; | ||
prov:wasDerivedFrom "ISBN 0-922152-36-5" . | ||
|
||
|
||
### http://sweetontology.net/matrFacility/GypsumQuarry | ||
somaf:Mine rdf:type owl:Class ; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. should be somaf:GypsumQuarry |
||
rdfs:subClassOf somaf:Quarry ; | ||
rdfs:label "gypsum quarry"@en ; | ||
skos:definition "An open or surface mineral working for the purpose of extracting gypsum"@en ; | ||
prov:wasDerivedFrom "ISBN 0-922152-36-5" . | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. prov:wasDerivedFrom has range prov:Entity, not obviously compatible with a string literal. Seems to me using something like dct:source would make more sense in this context. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Great! Also what I was looking for. I'll look across SWEET further for dct:source. I'm interested to see how we are citing sources elsewhere. That reference piece seems to be missing quite a bit right now. Speaking of a lack of source info, I was looking at SWEET's instantiation of minerals today in relation to how I'm working to bring Mindat minerals, along with the Strunz and Dana classifications, into our knowledge graph. Seems like an area maybe SWEET should cede territory to a domain group, focusing on perhaps clarifying higher level classes that help domains de/re-contextualize? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I agree, SWEET should just bridge to a mineral domain ontology (didn't @smrgeoinfo create one?) as per @skybristol 's comment above. |
||
|
||
|
||
### http://sweetontology.net/matrFacility/MiningFacility | ||
somaf:MiningFacility rdf:type owl:Class ; | ||
rdfs:subClassOf somaf:Facility ; | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should be somaf:Adit
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's not how we had this classified on our end, but I tend to agree. I was looking at the rest of this that comes from the USMIN source (with reference back to the AGI dictionary).