-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add hover interaction pointer cursor #1342
Open
silvester-pari
wants to merge
7
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
map/feat/hover-pointer
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
023908b
feat: add hover interaction pointer cursor
silvester-pari 9fcc629
chore: add test to check if the `hover` options are passed
silvester-pari ad15ea7
fix: remove hover interaction when removing select interaction
silvester-pari cd6a40d
chore: formatting
silvester-pari cc6d2dd
properly remove interaction on update
RobertOrthofer d9e42ad
enable all select tests
RobertOrthofer e6862cd
test select interaction removal via updating the layer
RobertOrthofer File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ | |
"stroke-color": "red", | ||
"stroke-width": 3 | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
"hover": { | ||
"cursor": "zoom-in" | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is this the first time we use ol-ext? do we need this really to solve the problem, i'm in principle ok with it, just trying to understand if this might have other implications like not being able to update OL because ol-ext does not support the new version yet, or something like that
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, this would be the first time using it, but probably not the last time. You're right, it could cause troubles when updating 🤔
An alternative would be implementing this functionality ourselves, where I would hope for support from @RobertOrthofer
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It does look like a bit of an overkill for this specific feature, as implementation would be quite trivial, something along the way of this:
but I'm not strictly against using
ol-ext
, they offer some useful or fancy stuff, and implementations are quite clean for the most part.... there might be an argument for not having this as an interaction that is added with a select layer, but rather have the pointer-changer as something the map simply does. The information if the pointer should change should be available on each layer, so if there is a feature at the pixel, and the layer of the feature has an active select interaction, the cursor could be changed to
pointer
.The pro of this is the possibility of multiple hover-interactions without interfering, the con is that I don't see an easy way of doing this with a
hitTolerance
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Difficult decision, am i understanding that in principle we are fine with this? So we go for it, and worst case if it creates trouble down the line we re-evaluate if we keep ol-ext? I would mark this as resolved then.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to have another option, I have created an alternative in #1348; it uses the pointermove event as @RobertOrthofer suggested, which makes the entire thing much simpler. The only issue I am currently facing is that I didn't find a way to test this.