Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[datadog_synthetics_test] Add handling of a wait step for multistep api tests #2472

Conversation

teodor2312
Copy link
Contributor

@teodor2312 teodor2312 commented Jul 2, 2024

This PR adds support for the wait step for multistep api tests.
Before this we only supported the Test step.

@teodor2312 teodor2312 changed the title add handling of a wait step for multistep api tests Add handling of a wait step for multistep api tests Jul 2, 2024
@teodor2312 teodor2312 changed the title Add handling of a wait step for multistep api tests [datadog_synthetics_test] Add handling of a wait step for multistep api tests Jul 2, 2024
@teodor2312 teodor2312 marked this pull request as ready for review July 2, 2024 15:59
@teodor2312 teodor2312 requested review from a team as code owners July 2, 2024 15:59
@teodor2312 teodor2312 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 2, 2024 16:06
Copy link
Contributor

@etnbrd etnbrd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍

@jack-edmonds-dd jack-edmonds-dd merged commit 8e82a25 into master Jul 2, 2024
10 checks passed
@jack-edmonds-dd jack-edmonds-dd deleted the datadog-api-spec/test/teodor.todorov/SYNTH-14544/add-multistep-wait-step branch July 2, 2024 18:08
bharling pushed a commit to bharling/terraform-provider-datadog that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2024
…pi tests (DataDog#2472)

* add handling of a wait step for multistep api tests

* add some fixes and update cassettes

* update docs
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants