[🤖] Update Supported Versions

[TonyCTHsu]

This is a PR to update the table for supported integration versions.
Workflow run: Generate Supported Versions
This should be tied to tracer releases, or triggered manually.

[github-actions]

👋 Hey @DataDog/ruby-guild, please fill "Change log entry" section in the pull request description.

If changes need to be present in CHANGELOG.md you can state it this way

**Change log entry**

Yes. A brief summary to be placed into the CHANGELOG.md

(possible answers Yes/Yep/Yeah)

Or you can opt out like that

**Change log entry**

None.

(possible answers No/Nope/None)

^{Visited at: 2024-12-19 19:58:39 UTC}

[datadog-datadog-prod-us1]

Datadog Report

Branch report: auto-generate/update-supported-versions
Commit report: 475c6f5
Test service: dd-trace-rb

❌ 1 Failed (0 Known Flaky), 22056 Passed, 1476 Skipped, 5m 47.39s Total Time

❌ Failed Tests (1)

• gem release process datadog.gemspec files includes all important files - rspec - Details

  Expand for error

   the missing elements were:      ["gem_output.json", "integration_versions.md"]
   
   Failure/Error:
     expect(gemspec.files)
       .to match_array(
         \`git ls-files -z\`
           .split("\x0")
           .reject { |f| f.match(directories_excluded) }
           .reject { |f| f.match(single_files_excluded) }
       )
   ...
  

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2025-01-15 22:53:37

Comparing candidate commit 475c6f5 in PR branch auto-generate/update-supported-versions with baseline commit 21106cd in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 31 metrics, 2 unstable metrics.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.71%. Comparing base (5361e8e) to head (92419ea).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4236      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.71%   97.71%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1356     1356              
  Lines       82490    82489       -1     
  Branches     4219     4219              
==========================================
- Hits        80607    80606       -1     
  Misses       1883     1883              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[bouwkast]

Just a question on Net::HTTP as I think the versions we're reporting are actually http.rb

[bouwkast]

I am unsure if this is correct - I think it is supposed to be Net::HTTP which is a library built into Ruby whereas http.rb is an actual Ruby gem.

So I think this one we may need to treat differently as it should map to the tested Ruby versions of Net::HTTP

Thoughts?

[marcotc]

All keys in this JSON file are Ruby gem names in https://rubygems.org/gems/.
So "http" is https://rubygems.org/gems/http, which they describe as "HTTP (The Gem! a.k.a. http.rb)": https://github.com/httprb/http?tab=readme-ov-file#about
It's ok to leave this is as http, since that's unambiguously the gem name.

Regarding Net::HTTP, it's always bundled with the Ruby VM, and it's this gem https://rubygems.org/gems/net-http.
Today we say this for its support:

I see it shows up in our gemfiles for newer versions of Ruby, so I'd say let it show up in this gem_output.json too, with whatever version we test against.

[bouwkast]

Ahh okay, so we essentially then have http and http.rb duplicated and are missing net-http in the table thanks!

[quinna-h]

This isn't in the docs, but we do have it as a contrib

[quinna-h]

check this for jruby

[quinna-h]

Checked: did not find hanami defined in any jruby gemfiles, despite the docs saying we do support for jruby.

[bouwkast]

Well I guess that is for no tested versions right?

Does it "work" for JRuby just lacks any tests?

[marcotc]

if it's not in the jruby gemfile locks, then we can set it to no support right now.

[quinna-h]

check this, our docs say >= 2.0

[quinna-h]

Do we need this? Not in the docs

[marcotc]

this is good, it's a real ruby gem we support for trace->log correlation.
we probably forgot to add it here and you are now improving it :)

[quinna-h]

Similarly here, we should check rails support. The docs say >= 4.0 for both ruby and jruby.