-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 309
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
clearer profiling error #4647
Merged
Merged
clearer profiling error #4647
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't there like a convention to combine/chain errors? Something like this:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or even this:
Though that might ruin the cardinality or error messages and undermine the problem you're trying to solve...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's error.cause, but I'm not sure it's supported across our full version range.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we don't use the custom syntax:
But instead build it manually:
Then the Node.js version being used only matters if we care how
console.log
outputs the error - which I guess we don't. I assume we just need to make sure that thelog.error
function knows to also take into account any linkedcause
error.This is something we should make sure regardless of this PR as other libraries might make use of the
cause
property and we need to properly capture that information.Gotcha: There is a slight difference between how
console.log
outputs an error created with the two approaches listed above. If using the options object with thecause
property that's only supported in Node.js 16.9+, then the stack trace outputted looks like this:If we just naively add a
cause
property on an error object after creation-time, theconsole.log
output looks like this:Notice the tiny difference between
[cause]
andcause
. I'm not sure if that's important, but it means that there's a slight difference in the implementation.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we sub-class our errors we could have it version detect and do
super(message, options)
where supported and dosuper(message); this.cause = options.cause
where not supported.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's moot in this case because I don't think the wrapper/parent error adds any value here.