Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[LUPEYALPHA-954] FE admin tasks #3157

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 6, 2024
Merged

[LUPEYALPHA-954] FE admin tasks #3157

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 6, 2024

Conversation

asmega
Copy link
Contributor

@asmega asmega commented Sep 6, 2024

Context

return unless awaiting_task?

no_data || no_match || matched
end

private

def required?
claim.eligibility.teacher_reference_number.present?
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure if this negatively impacts other policies?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should be ok, most of the other journeys require a TRN from the claimant to submit, IRP doesn't but it doesn't use this claim verifier

Comment on lines +29 to +40
def employment
[]
end

def identity_confirmation
[]
end

def student_loan_plan
[]
end

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

placeholders

@asmega asmega marked this pull request as ready for review September 6, 2024 12:50
Copy link
Contributor

@rjlynch rjlynch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice 👍
I think pulling out a class for the policies task lists is a great idea

return unless awaiting_task?

no_data || no_match || matched
end

private

def required?
claim.eligibility.teacher_reference_number.present?
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should be ok, most of the other journeys require a TRN from the claimant to submit, IRP doesn't but it doesn't use this claim verifier

unless claim.policy.further_education_payments?
case policy
when Policies::FurtherEducationPayments
Policies::FurtherEducationPayments::ClaimCheckingTasks
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 nice

@asmega asmega force-pushed the fe-admin-tasks branch 2 times, most recently from 7168d24 to 02c0999 Compare September 6, 2024 13:20
@asmega asmega merged commit 70e2766 into master Sep 6, 2024
14 checks passed
@asmega asmega deleted the fe-admin-tasks branch September 6, 2024 13:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants