Merge pull request #3416 from DFE-Digital/CAPT-2011/performance-disci…

…plinary-ammendment Don't invert the provider outcome
DFE-Digital · Nov 22, 2024 · d1b202c · d1b202c
2 parents 6d3f5c6 + 20b27f3
commit d1b202c
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 2 changed files with 3 additions and 10 deletions.
diff --git a/app/models/policies/further_education_payments/admin_provider_verification_task_presenter.rb b/app/models/policies/further_education_payments/admin_provider_verification_task_presenter.rb
@@ -115,14 +115,7 @@ def claimant_answer(assertion)
       end
 
       def provider_answer(assertion)
-        case assertion["name"]
-        when "subject_to_formal_performance_action", "subject_to_disciplinary_action"
-          # Due to the phrasing of the question to the provider, we need to
-          # negate their answer when displaying it in the admin ui.
-          assertion["outcome"] ? "No" : "Yes"
-        else
-          assertion["outcome"] ? "Yes" : "No"
-        end
+        assertion["outcome"] ? "Yes" : "No"
       end
 
       def subjects_taught

diff --git a/config/locales/en.yml b/config/locales/en.yml
@@ -941,12 +941,12 @@ en:
               true: "Yes"
               false: "No"
           subject_to_formal_performance_action:
-            label: "Performance measures"
+            label: "No performance measures"
             claimant_answers:
               true: "Yes"
               false: "No"
           subject_to_disciplinary_action:
-            label: "Disciplinary action"
+            label: "No disciplinary action"
             claimant_answers:
               true: "Yes"
               false: "No"