Weaken GRANDPA proof validation #497
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
`verify_with_voter_set` function is performing additional validation that go beyond the [standard implementation](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3f/consensus/master/pdf/grandpa.pdf) (section 2.3), possibly leading to proofs not being accepted while valid. Instead, we need to accept all finality justifications where is_valid is true. The equivocations or other misbehaviors detected in the justifications must be handled too but not should not reject the proof.
blasrodri
approved these changes
May 15, 2024
|
Related discussion for reference: https://substrate.stackexchange.com/questions/8701/grandpa-finality-proofs-validation-and-equivocations |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
verify_with_voter_setfunction is performing additional validation that go beyond the standard implementation (section 2.3), possibly leading to proofs not being accepted while valid.Instead, we need to accept all finality justifications where is_valid is true. The equivocations or other misbehaviors detected in the justifications must be handled too but not should not reject the proof.