Deployed 2933809 with MkDocs version: 1.6.0

03_cogdataset/index.html

@@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ <h4 id="inclusion-criteria">Inclusion Criteria</h4>
 </li>
 </ul>
 <h4 id="quality-check-and-exclusion-criteria">Quality Check and Exclusion Criteria</h4>
-<p>For M-EEG, the first stage of the third-level checks focused on system-related and external noise generators. It was tested using the signal spectra in the empty room recording, the resting state session, and the experiment itself for all sensors. Any sensor and/or specific frequency revealing extensive noise using visual inspection, was flagged to document potential problems. Ultimately, this did not lead to any exclusions. Next, all experimental data blocks were visually inspected for abnormalities in spectra (peaks not explainable by physiology), and in ICA components, and checked for extremely noisy (based on the score of differences between the original and Maxwell-filtered data &gt; 7) and flat sensors. The latter step was performed in a collaboration between the data monitoring team and members of the centers where data was acquired to check whether any potential changes in preprocessing for particular subjects were needed. Finally, we tested if all experimental cells (i.e. task-relevant non-targets and task-irrelevant stimuli for each one of the four categories) have enough trials (N=30).</p>
+<p>For M-EEG, the first stage of the third-level checks focused on system-related and external noise generators. It was tested using the signal spectra in the empty room recording, the resting state session, and the experiment itself for all sensors. Any sensor and/or specific frequency revealing extensive noise using visual inspection, was flagged to document potential problems. Ultimately, this did not lead to any exclusions. Next, all experimental data blocks were visually inspected for abnormalities in spectra (peaks not explainable by physiology), and in ICA components, and checked for extremely noisy (based on the score of differences between the original and Maxwell-filtered data &gt; 7) and flat sensors. The latter step was performed in a collaboration between the data monitoring team and members of the centers where data was acquired to check whether any potential changes in preprocessing for particular subjects were needed. Finally, we tested if all experimental cells (i.e. task-relevant non-targets and task-irrelevant stimuli for each one of the four categories) have enough trials.</p>
 <h3 id="ieeg-data-acquisition">iEEG Data Acquisition</h3>
 <p>iEEG recordings were obtained from patients with pharmacologically resistant epilepsy undergoing invasive electrophysiological monitoring at the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center at New York University (NYU) Langone Health Center, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Children’s Hospital Boston (Harvard Medical School), and University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health (WU).</p>
 <h4 id="hardware_1">Hardware</h4>

index.html

@@ -202,5 +202,5 @@ <h1 id="welcome-to-the-cogitate-data-release-documentation">Welcome to the Cogit
 
 <!--
 MkDocs version : 1.6.0
-Build Date UTC : 2024-05-28 10:52:50.203516+00:00
+Build Date UTC : 2024-05-28 11:50:00.021928+00:00
 -->