-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Provincial and Districts data of NRB #49
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The percentages for the "All" rows are incorrect.
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ | |||
State/Province,Total number of active male accounts,Total number of active female accounts,Total population,Percentage of active male accounts,Percentage of active female accounts | |||
(All),9168740,5816647,22183283,259,169 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe the percentages for the first column are incorrect. They are both over 100%. It looks like they were derived from adding the percentages in the provinces together rather than calculating percentages for the full population.
What do "Percentage of active male accounts" and "Percentage of active male accounts" mean in these data? Is it:
percent of accounts that are held by men and by women and that are "active"
percent of men (or women) in the total population who own a savings account?
What does "active" mean in these data? That isn't something that would be useful to answer when the data are used.
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ | |||
District,Total number of active male accounts,Total number of active female accounts,Total population,Percentage of active male accounts,Percentage of active female accounts | |||
(All),9168740,5816647,22183283,2770,1714 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Percentages for the first column both exceed 100%.
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ | |||
District,Total number of registered saving accounts,Total population,Registered saving accounts penetration (%) | |||
(All),18446149,22183283,5404 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Percentage exceeds 100%!
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ | |||
District,Total number of registered saving accounts,Total population,Registered saving accounts penetration (%) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we have a gloss somewhere, perhaps in a README, that describes the meaning of terms like what the "penetration" of saving accounts means, and what counts as active, etc.? That will make it easier to consume these data. Could we also have link to the original data set to make verification and review easy?
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ | |||
State/Province,Total number of registered saving accounts,Total population,Registered saving accounts penetration (%) | |||
(All),18446149,22183283,534 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same here -- percentage exceeds 100%
@nikeshbalami - can you pls advise? If the data is in accurate we don't have to use it I believe.. |
Although it comes from the official source, NRB hasn't described the metadata and probably they have their own way of calculation. Let leave this issue for a while, I will have a look when I am free. |
No description provided.