Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[bug_fix]: Add subclass to aci_domain_to_vlan_pool to fix deletion of binding (DCNE-207) #695

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 18, 2024

Conversation

edudppaz
Copy link
Contributor

When state is absent, only the subclass for the domain should be deleted (infraRsVlanNs) not the whole domain config.

When state is absent, only the subclass for the domain should be deleted (infraRsVlanNs) not the whole domain config.
@akinross akinross changed the title [bug_fix]: Add subclass to aci_domain_to_vlan_pool to fix deletion of binding [bug_fix]: Add subclass to aci_domain_to_vlan_pool to fix deletion of binding (DCNE-207) Oct 15, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 15, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 35.76%. Comparing base (16cb183) to head (da5643f).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
plugins/modules/aci_domain_to_vlan_pool.py 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (16cb183) and HEAD (da5643f). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE
Flag BASE (16cb183) HEAD (da5643f)
integration 1 0
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #695       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   94.65%   35.76%   -58.90%     
===========================================
  Files         260      267        +7     
  Lines       12051    12205      +154     
  Branches     1826     1840       +14     
===========================================
- Hits        11407     4365     -7042     
- Misses        275     7840     +7565     
+ Partials      369        0      -369     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration ?
sanity 35.76% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@edudppaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Have updated the module with your proposal @akinross , thank you very much :) learning how these modules/filters work.

@edudppaz edudppaz requested a review from akinross October 16, 2024 10:45
Copy link
Collaborator

@akinross akinross left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@shrsr shrsr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@gmicol gmicol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@anvitha-jain anvitha-jain left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@lhercot lhercot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@lhercot lhercot merged commit 2fdee82 into CiscoDevNet:master Oct 18, 2024
21 of 22 checks passed
@lhercot
Copy link
Member

lhercot commented Oct 18, 2024

Thanks for the contribution!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants