Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Correct vPC member side (DCNE-93) #663

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 11, 2024

Conversation

timcragg
Copy link
Contributor

@timcragg timcragg commented Jun 11, 2024

Minor bugfix - the l3extMember object uses side instead of name to build the DN, so the module should configure the side attribute instead of the name (I believe the name attribute is left as null if you build an l3extMember object through the APIC GUI).
Closes DCNE-93

akinross
akinross previously approved these changes Jun 11, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@akinross akinross left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@akinross akinross force-pushed the fix/vpc_member_fix branch from 9dc36a6 to a55c799 Compare June 11, 2024 18:18
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 35.75%. Comparing base (555a942) to head (a55c799).
Report is 23 commits behind head on master.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (555a942) and HEAD (a55c799). Click for more details.

HEAD has 15 uploads less than BASE
Flag BASE (555a942) HEAD (a55c799)
unit 8 0
integration 1 0
sanity 10 4
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #663       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   58.46%   35.75%   -22.72%     
===========================================
  Files         269      266        -3     
  Lines       12352    12165      -187     
  Branches     1862     1837       -25     
===========================================
- Hits         7222     4349     -2873     
- Misses       5002     7816     +2814     
+ Partials      128        0      -128     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration ?
sanity 35.75% <ø> (ø)
unit ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@samiib samiib left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for fixing the bug.
Would it be okay to also update the tests for this module? It appears to be lacking some asserts that would have detected this issue if added.

@samiib samiib added the jira-sync Sync this issue to Jira label Aug 14, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title fix: Correct vPC member side fix: Correct vPC member side (DCNE-93) Aug 14, 2024
@samiib
Copy link
Collaborator

samiib commented Aug 14, 2024

@timcragg Hi Tim, just wondering if you are still working on this one or if you have had a chance to look at the PR review comment?

Copy link
Collaborator

@samiib samiib left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@gmicol gmicol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@anvitha-jain anvitha-jain left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@lhercot lhercot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@lhercot lhercot merged commit 16cb183 into CiscoDevNet:master Oct 11, 2024
21 of 22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
jira-sync Sync this issue to Jira
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants