Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Planning codelet #16

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Planning codelet #16

wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

eduardofroes
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

build.gradle Outdated
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ description = "CST is the Cognitive Systems Toolkit, a toolkit for the construct

sourceCompatibility = 1.8
targetCompatibility = 1.8
version = '0.5.1'
version = '0.5.2-beta'
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Following the Semantic Versioning 2.0.0 that we have been using, I recommend this PR to bump CST's version to 0.6.0, as we effectively have a new feature here.


@Override
public void proc() {
outputPlanMO.setI(planning(inputInitialStateMO, inputGoalsMO, inputActionsMO).getI());
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, but without a test that can be used also as a spec to this Codelet, it becomes quite hard to understand how all these abstract concepts should be used in practice. What do you think of adding a test to this PR, so anyone would have it as a spec for how to use this new PlanningCodelet?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

André I will implement tests using planning codelet in this PR, but I haven't had time to do that yet.

});
}

public abstract Memory planning(Memory currentState, Memory goals, Memory actions, Memory transitionFunctions, Memory planningRequest);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Method planning has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.

});
}

public abstract Memory planning(Memory initialState, Memory currentState, Memory goals, Memory proceduralMemory, Memory transitionFunctions, Memory planningRequest);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Method planning has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.

});
}

public abstract Memory planning(Memory initialState, Memory observations, Memory goals, Memory proceduralMemory, Memory transitionFunctions, Memory planningRequest);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Method planning has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.

@codeclimate
Copy link

codeclimate bot commented Sep 30, 2020

Code Climate has analyzed commit 2609b29 and detected 1 issue on this pull request.

Here's the issue category breakdown:

Category Count
Complexity 1

The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 0.0% (90% is the threshold).

This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 21.4%.

View more on Code Climate.

@rgudwin
Copy link
Member

rgudwin commented Sep 28, 2021

This merge request must be actualized in order to be considered, as there are conflicts with the actual code.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants