Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gold standard assembly and binning ran despite being set to false #134

Open
elximo opened this issue May 20, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Gold standard assembly and binning ran despite being set to false #134

elximo opened this issue May 20, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@elximo
Copy link

elximo commented May 20, 2022

Hi CAMISIM,

Thanks for the great tool. I have just started to use it to generate metagenomes based on a custom profile. Since I am using genomes of assemblies of relatively new strains, I am using the metagenomesimulation.py my_config.ini

To save time and since I am not interested in those, I set the 3 settings to false in my ini file.

[Main]
...
gsa=False
pooled_gsa=False
anonymous=False
compress=1

However, the pipeline still assembles, pools and bins the reads despite setting them to False as shown above. Is there a way to avoid running these steps as they take some time (~1h for 4G x 2 samples dataset). I am using the most recent git clone (as of May 11th, 2022).

PS. Is there a setting to output separate pooled PE files instead of the interleaved one? I think using anonymous=False produces separate PE genome files. I would like to have just the separate but pooled PE files.

Much appreciated.
Hazem Sharaf

@AlphaSquad AlphaSquad added the bug label May 24, 2022
@AlphaSquad AlphaSquad added this to the v2.0 milestone May 24, 2022
@AlphaSquad
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi Hazem,

thank you for your report, that obviously should not be like that. I will investigate and come back to you and hopefully there is a quick fix.
Regarding the interleaved/split files: The easiest solution here is probably to just a method to split the file "manually", e.g. seqkit

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants