dissect: add module packages

[D3vil0p3r]

Close #3688

[noraj]

That's a lot of work. I don't have time to test this right now. At a glance I can see license identifiers are old, could you upgrade to SPDX identifier please?

I hope in the long run that won't turn to be a hell to maintain and that we won't need to switch to virtualenv.

[D3vil0p3r]

Licenses upgraded. I did basic tests on all of them during packaging and they worked correctly.

[noraj]

Licenses upgraded. I did basic tests on all of them during packaging and they worked correctly.

Yes but it will be soon obsolete when AL RFC-0016 will be finalised.

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#license

Note: Arch Linux is currently undergoing a transition to SPDX style identifiers. Some issues may still require ironing out. This section focuses on the SPDX format. If you encounter any trouble, please report them and discuss with the community.

[D3vil0p3r]

At least we can manage that massive license change by 1 or 2 sed commands. Btw thanks for the last link.

[noptrix]

please, also check, if something is being compiled use arch=('x86_64' 'aarch64') otherwise you can leave arch=('any')

[noptrix]

@D3vil0p3r wrong arch setups :/ i've fixed them - please check my last commits for dissect. again, as soon as something gets compiled to a binary, we need to use ('x86_64', 'aarch64'), otherwise leave as ('any')

[D3vil0p3r]

Sorry @noptrix during the building of them I noted that it produced bdist-x86_64 strings.. so I assumed all of them needed ('x86_64', 'aarch64'). How did you check that, instead, any was needed for those dissect in the last commits?

[noptrix]

@D3vil0p3r no worries at all, just for the future... uhm, i am building them and see that nothign gets compiled, no binaries built. maybe there is another way to do that easier...