Add oAuth logins #532
Add oAuth logins #532
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe changes introduce OAuth integration into the application, adding support for GitHub, Google, and Discord authentication. New environment variables are defined, and a series of components and utility functions are created to manage OAuth login and callback processes. The Prisma schema is updated to include an Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant OAuthClient
participant OAuthRouter
participant AuthService
User->>OAuthClient: Request OAuth Login
OAuthClient->>OAuthRouter: Generate Authorization URL
OAuthRouter->>User: Redirect to OAuth Provider
User->>OAuthProvider: Authenticate
OAuthProvider->>User: Redirect back with code
User->>OAuthRouter: Validate Login with code
OAuthRouter->>AuthService: Validate Authorization Code
AuthService->>OAuthRouter: Return User Info
OAuthRouter->>User: Login Successful
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 20
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (24)
src/app/oauth/[provider]/page.tsx (2)
3-5: LGTM: Imports are correct and necessaryThe imports are correctly structured and all necessary for the component's functionality. Good job on avoiding unused imports.
For consistency, consider using single quotes for the import from React, matching the style used for the custom component import:
-import { Suspense } from "react"; +import { Suspense } from 'react';
7-13: LGTM: Component structure is good, with room for improvementThe Page component is well-structured and correctly uses Suspense to wrap the PageOAuthCallback component. This is a good practice for handling potential asynchronous operations.
Consider the following improvements:
- Add an error boundary to handle potential errors in the OAuth callback process:
import { ErrorBoundary } from 'react-error-boundary'; export default function Page() { return ( <ErrorBoundary fallback={<div>Something went wrong</div>}> <Suspense fallback={<div>Loading...</div>}> <PageOAuthCallback /> </Suspense> </ErrorBoundary> ); }
If possible within your routing structure, consider a more descriptive name for the component, such as 'OAuthCallbackPage'.
Add a loading fallback to the Suspense component to improve user experience:
<Suspense fallback={<div>Loading...</div>}>src/server/config/oauth/index.ts (2)
8-14: LGTM: Well-implemented oAuthProvider function with a minor suggestion.The
oAuthProviderfunction is well-implemented, using pattern matching for a type-safe and concise solution. The exhaustive match ensures all cases are handled, which is excellent for preventing runtime errors.Consider adding explicit error handling for invalid provider inputs. While the exhaustive match will throw an error for unhandled cases, a custom error message could be more informative. Here's a suggested implementation:
export const oAuthProvider = (provider: OAuthProvider) => { return match(provider) .with('github', () => github) .with('google', () => google) .with('discord', () => discord) .otherwise(() => { throw new Error(`Unsupported OAuth provider: ${provider}`); }); };This change would provide a more descriptive error message if an unsupported provider is passed to the function.
1-14: Overall, excellent implementation of the oAuthProvider configuration.This file successfully implements a crucial part of the OAuth integration, aligning well with the PR objectives. The code is concise, type-safe, and easy to maintain. The use of pattern matching and exhaustive checks contributes to the robustness of the implementation.
As the application grows, consider the following architectural advice:
- Implement a strategy for easily adding new OAuth providers in the future.
- Consider creating a centralized error handling mechanism for OAuth-related errors.
- Ensure that this OAuth configuration is well-documented in the project's documentation.
prisma/schema/auth.prisma (1)
1-8: Approve with suggestions for improvementThe
OAuthAccountmodel structure looks good overall. Here are some suggestions to enhance it:
- Add a unique index on the
userIdfield for better query performance when looking up OAuth accounts by user.- Add a
@uniqueconstraint to theuserIdfield to ensure a one-to-one relationship with the User model.- Specify non-nullable constraints for all fields to ensure data integrity.
Consider applying the following changes:
model OAuthAccount { - provider String - providerUserId String - userId String + provider String + providerUserId String + userId String @unique user User @relation(references: [id], fields: [userId], onDelete: Cascade) @@id([provider, providerUserId]) + @@index([userId]) }These changes will improve query performance, ensure data integrity, and maintain a clear one-to-one relationship between
OAuthAccountandUser.src/server/config/oauth/utils.ts (1)
24-25: LGTM with a suggestion: Consider adding error handlingThe
getOAuthCallbackUrlfunction is well-implemented and uses environment variables appropriately. However, to improve robustness, consider adding a check for theenv.NEXT_PUBLIC_BASE_URLvalue.You could add a simple check like this:
export const getOAuthCallbackUrl = (provider: OAuthProvider) => { if (!env.NEXT_PUBLIC_BASE_URL) { throw new Error('NEXT_PUBLIC_BASE_URL is not defined'); } return `${env.NEXT_PUBLIC_BASE_URL}/oauth/${provider}`; };This ensures that the application fails fast if the required environment variable is not set.
src/lib/oauth/config.ts (4)
1-8: LGTM! Consider using a more specific import from 'react'.The imports and type definitions look good. Using Zod for validation is a great choice for type safety.
Consider changing the import from React to be more specific:
-import { FC } from 'react'; +import type { FC } from 'react';This change explicitly imports FC as a type, which can help with tree-shaking and clarity.
10-32: LGTM! Consider extracting provider configurations.The OAUTH_PROVIDERS constant is well-structured and type-safe. The use of the satisfies keyword is excellent for ensuring type conformance while maintaining flexibility.
For improved maintainability, consider extracting each provider's configuration into separate constants:
const GITHUB_PROVIDER = { isEnabled: true, order: 1, label: 'GitHub', icon: FaGithub, }; // Similar constants for DISCORD_PROVIDER and GOOGLE_PROVIDER export const OAUTH_PROVIDERS = { github: GITHUB_PROVIDER, discord: DISCORD_PROVIDER, google: GOOGLE_PROVIDER, } satisfies Record< OAuthProvider, { isEnabled: boolean; order: number; label: string; icon: FC } >;This approach would make it easier to manage individual provider configurations and potentially reuse them elsewhere if needed.
34-40: LGTM! Consider a minor performance optimization.The OAUTH_PROVIDERS_ENABLED_ARRAY constant is well-implemented, using functional programming techniques to create a sorted array of enabled providers.
For a slight performance optimization, consider combining the map and filter operations:
export const OAUTH_PROVIDERS_ENABLED_ARRAY = entries(OAUTH_PROVIDERS) .reduce((acc, [key, value]) => { if (value.isEnabled) { acc.push({ provider: key, ...value }); } return acc; }, [] as Array<{ provider: OAuthProvider } & typeof OAUTH_PROVIDERS[OAuthProvider]>) .sort((a, b) => a.order - b.order);This approach avoids creating an intermediate array for disabled providers, which could be beneficial if the list of providers grows larger in the future.
1-40: Great implementation! Consider adding JSDoc comments.Overall, this file is well-structured, type-safe, and aligns perfectly with the PR objectives of integrating OAuth providers. The use of TypeScript features, Zod for validation, and functional programming techniques contributes to a maintainable and extensible codebase.
To further improve the code, consider adding JSDoc comments to the exported types and constants. This would enhance the developer experience when using these exports in other parts of the application. For example:
/** * Represents the configuration for an OAuth provider. */ export type OAuthProvider = z.infer<ReturnType<typeof zOAuthProvider>>; /** * Returns a Zod schema for validating OAuth provider names. */ export const zOAuthProvider = () => z.enum(['github', 'google', 'discord']); /** * Configuration object for all supported OAuth providers. */ export const OAUTH_PROVIDERS = { // ... (existing code) }; /** * Array of enabled OAuth providers, sorted by their display order. */ export const OAUTH_PROVIDERS_ENABLED_ARRAY = // ... (existing code)These comments will provide helpful context when hovering over the exports in IDEs and when generating documentation.
src/locales/en/auth.json (1)
5-7: LGTM! Consider adding more user guidance.The new OAuth error message is well-structured and consistent with other entries in the file. It clearly indicates the nature of the error (failure to create a provider URL).
To further improve user experience, consider:
- Adding a "description" field with more detailed information or next steps for the user.
- Slightly modifying the title to be more action-oriented.
Here's a suggested enhancement:
"oAuthError": { - "title": "Failed to create the {{provider}} url" + "title": "Unable to connect with {{provider}}", + "description": "We encountered an issue while setting up the connection. Please try again or contact support if the problem persists." }This provides more context and guidance to the user when they encounter this error.
src/locales/fr/auth.json (1)
29-31: LGTM! Consider adding more OAuth-related messages.The new OAuth error message is well-integrated and consistent with the existing translations. It appropriately uses a placeholder for the provider name, allowing for dynamic error messages.
Consider if additional OAuth-related messages might be needed, such as:
- Success messages for OAuth login
- Specific error messages for different OAuth failure scenarios (e.g., account linking, permission issues)
If these are handled elsewhere or not needed, please disregard this suggestion.
src/features/auth/PageLogin.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-65: Great job integrating OAuth login functionality!The changes to
PageLoginsuccessfully introduce OAuth login capabilities while maintaining the existing component structure and functionality. This aligns well with the PR objective of integrating Lucia oAuth providers with Artic.Consider the following to further improve the implementation:
- Ensure that the new OAuth components are responsive and follow the mobile-first approach mentioned in the PR checklist.
- If not already done, add appropriate error handling for OAuth-related failures.
- Consider adding unit tests for the new OAuth components to maintain code quality and prevent regressions.
src/features/auth/OAuthLogin.tsx (2)
21-54: LGTM: OAuthLoginButton component is well-implemented.The component effectively handles the OAuth flow, including loading states and error scenarios. However, consider extracting the error message translation to a separate function for better maintainability.
Consider refactoring the error handling as follows:
const getErrorMessage = (provider: OAuthProvider, errorMessage: string) => { return { title: t('auth:login.feedbacks.oAuthError.title', { provider: OAUTH_PROVIDERS[provider].label, }), description: errorMessage, }; }; // In the onError callback onError: (error) => { toastError(getErrorMessage(provider, error.message)); },This change would improve readability and make it easier to reuse the error message format if needed elsewhere.
56-76: LGTM: OAuthLoginButtonsGrid component is well-implemented.The component efficiently renders a grid of OAuth login buttons, handling cases with no enabled providers and adjusting the layout for an odd number of providers.
Consider extracting the complex condition for the
_firstprop into a separate variable or function for improved readability:const isFirstButtonFullWidth = OAUTH_PROVIDERS_ENABLED_ARRAY.length % 2 !== 0; // In the component JSX _first={{ gridColumn: isFirstButtonFullWidth ? 'span 2' : undefined, }}This small change would make the code slightly more self-explanatory.
src/env.mjs (3)
9-13: Approve implementation with minor suggestion for documentation.The
zOptionalWithReplaceMefunction is well-implemented and serves its purpose effectively. It provides a clean way to handle optional environment variables with placeholder values.Consider adding a brief JSDoc comment to explain the function's purpose and behavior. This would enhance code readability and maintainability. For example:
/** * Creates a Zod schema for optional strings that transforms 'REPLACE ME' into undefined. * This is useful for handling placeholder values in environment variables. * @returns {z.ZodEffects<z.ZodOptional<z.ZodString>, string | undefined, string | undefined>} */ const zOptionalWithReplaceMe = () => // ... (existing implementation)
24-31: Approve OAuth environment variables with suggestion for consistency.The addition of OAuth-related environment variables for GitHub, Google, and Discord is well-implemented and aligns with the PR's objective. The use of
zOptionalWithReplaceMefor all variables ensures consistent handling of placeholder values.For improved consistency and readability, consider adding a comment above each group of provider-specific variables. This would make it easier to identify and manage different OAuth providers in the future. For example:
// GitHub OAuth GITHUB_CLIENT_ID: zOptionalWithReplaceMe(), GITHUB_CLIENT_SECRET: zOptionalWithReplaceMe(), // Google OAuth GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID: zOptionalWithReplaceMe(), GOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET: zOptionalWithReplaceMe(), // Discord OAuth DISCORD_CLIENT_ID: zOptionalWithReplaceMe(), DISCORD_CLIENT_SECRET: zOptionalWithReplaceMe(),
95-102: Approve runtimeEnv additions with suggestion for consistency.The addition of OAuth-related environment variables to the
runtimeEnvobject is correct and necessary. The implementation follows the established pattern in the file.For consistency with the earlier suggestion and to maintain readability as the number of OAuth providers potentially grows, consider adding comments to separate the provider-specific variables:
// GitHub OAuth GITHUB_CLIENT_ID: process.env.GITHUB_CLIENT_ID, GITHUB_CLIENT_SECRET: process.env.GITHUB_CLIENT_SECRET, // Google OAuth GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID: process.env.GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID, GOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET: process.env.GOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET, // Discord OAuth DISCORD_CLIENT_ID: process.env.DISCORD_CLIENT_ID, DISCORD_CLIENT_SECRET: process.env.DISCORD_CLIENT_SECRET,src/features/auth/PageRegister.tsx (1)
94-97: LGTM: OAuth components integrated correctly.The
OAuthLoginButtonsGridandOAuthLoginDividercomponents are well-placed within the registration page structure. This addition aligns with the PR's objective of integrating OAuth logins.For consistency with the surrounding code, consider adding a
spacingprop to these components:- <OAuthLoginButtonsGrid /> - <OAuthLoginDivider /> + <OAuthLoginButtonsGrid spacing={4} /> + <OAuthLoginDivider spacing={4} />This assumes these components accept a
spacingprop and would make them consistent with the<Stack spacing={6}>that wraps the entire component.src/features/auth/PageOAuthCallback.tsx (1)
56-56: Component renders only a loader without error handling for rendering failures.The component returns
<LoaderFull />and does not handle potential rendering errors. Consider adding an error boundary or fallback UI for better user experience.src/server/config/oauth/providers/github.ts (1)
37-38: Correct the typo in error message: 'environnement' should be 'environment'.The error message
'Missing GitHub environnement variables'contains a typo. Replace'environnement'with'environment'to correct the spelling.Apply this diff to fix the typo in both occurrences:
code: 'NOT_IMPLEMENTED', - message: 'Missing GitHub environnement variables', + message: 'Missing GitHub environment variables', });Also applies to: 48-49
src/server/routers/oauth.tsx (3)
40-52: Specify theSameSiteattribute for cookies to enhance securityWhen setting cookies for
stateandcodeVerifier, it's a good practice to include thesameSiteattribute. This helps mitigate the risk of Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks by controlling how cookies are sent with cross-site requests.Update the cookie settings to include
sameSite:cookies().set(`${input.provider}_oauth_state`, state, { httpOnly: true, secure: env.NODE_ENV === 'production', maxAge: 60 * 10, // 10 minutes path: '/', + sameSite: 'lax', }); cookies().set(`${input.provider}_oauth_codeVerifier`, codeVerifier, { httpOnly: true, secure: env.NODE_ENV === 'production', maxAge: 60 * 10, // 10 minutes path: '/', + sameSite: 'lax', });
114-118: Log error details for better debuggingIn the catch block for validating the authorization code, consider logging the error details to aid in troubleshooting. Ensure that no sensitive information is logged.
Update the catch block to include error logging:
} catch (error) { ctx.logger.error( `Failed to validate the ${input.provider} authorization code`, + { error } ); throw new TRPCError({ code: 'BAD_REQUEST', message: `Failed to validate the ${input.provider} authorization code`, }); }
127-132: Enhance error logging when retrieving the provider userSimilarly, logging the error when failing to retrieve the user from the provider can help with debugging issues. Ensure sensitive information is not exposed in the logs.
Update the catch block:
} catch (error) { + ctx.logger.error( + `Failed to retrieve the ${input.provider} user`, + { error } + ); throw new TRPCError({ code: 'INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR', message: `Failed to retrieve the ${input.provider} user`, }); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (22)
- .env.example (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- prisma/schema/auth.prisma (1 hunks)
- prisma/schema/user.prisma (1 hunks)
- src/app/oauth/[provider]/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/env.mjs (3 hunks)
- src/features/auth/OAuthLogin.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/features/auth/PageLogin.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/features/auth/PageOAuthCallback.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/features/auth/PageRegister.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/lib/oauth/config.ts (1 hunks)
- src/locales/ar/auth.json (1 hunks)
- src/locales/en/auth.json (1 hunks)
- src/locales/fr/auth.json (1 hunks)
- src/locales/sw/auth.json (1 hunks)
- src/server/config/oauth/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/config/oauth/providers/discord.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/config/oauth/providers/github.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/config/oauth/providers/google.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/config/oauth/utils.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/router.ts (2 hunks)
- src/server/routers/oauth.tsx (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- prisma/schema/user.prisma
🔇 Additional comments (23)
src/app/oauth/[provider]/page.tsx (2)
1-1: LGTM: Correct use of 'use client' directiveThe 'use client' directive is correctly placed at the top of the file, indicating that this is a client-side component. This is necessary for the use of React hooks like Suspense in Next.js 13+.
1-13: Overall: Well-structured component aligning with PR objectivesThis file successfully introduces an OAuth callback handling page, aligning well with the PR's objective of integrating OAuth logins. The code is clean, follows React and Next.js best practices, and is focused on a single responsibility.
While there are minor suggestions for improvement (as mentioned in previous comments), the overall implementation is solid and serves its purpose effectively.
To ensure this component is properly integrated into the routing system, let's verify its location and any related route configurations:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: OAuth callback route configuration is correct
The
src/app/oauth/[provider]/page.tsxfile is correctly placed for Next.js routing, and no additional OAuth callback route configurations were found. This confirms that the component is properly integrated and aligns with the PR objectives of integrating OAuth logins.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the OAuth callback route configuration # Test 1: Check if the file is in the correct location for Next.js routing if [ -f "src/app/oauth/[provider]/page.tsx" ]; then echo "File is correctly placed for Next.js routing" else echo "Warning: File may not be in the correct location for Next.js routing" fi # Test 2: Check for any additional route configurations echo "Checking for additional route configurations:" rg --type typescript "oauth.*callback" src/appLength of output: 332
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify additional OAuth callback route configurations without relying on file type aliases # Search for patterns related to OAuth callbacks in TypeScript files rg "oauth.*callback" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" src/appLength of output: 59
src/server/config/oauth/index.ts (1)
1-6: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and appropriate.The imports are correctly structured, importing necessary dependencies and provider configurations. The use of 'ts-pattern' for pattern matching is a good choice for type-safe matching.
src/server/router.ts (2)
4-4: LGTM: Import statement for oauthRouter added correctly.The import statement for
oauthRouteris properly formatted and consistent with the existing import style. This addition is necessary for integrating the OAuth functionality into the application router.
Line range hint
1-24: Overall assessment: OAuth router successfully integrated.The changes in this file effectively integrate the OAuth functionality into the application's routing system. The import statement and the addition to the
appRouterobject are both correctly implemented and consistent with the existing code structure. These modifications align well with the PR objective of integrating Lucia oAuth providers with Artic.As a reminder, please ensure that the
oauthRouteris fully implemented and tested, and that all necessary OAuth-related environment variables are properly set up as mentioned in the PR description.src/server/config/oauth/utils.ts (2)
5-22: LGTM: Well-structuredOAuthClienttype definitionThe
OAuthClienttype is comprehensive and well-defined. It covers the essential operations for OAuth authentication, including creating authorization URLs, validating authorization codes, and retrieving user information. The use ofPromise<T>for asynchronous operations and the inclusion ofAppContextin thegetUsermethod are appropriate.
1-3: LGTM: Appropriate importsThe import statements are clear, concise, and relevant to the functionality in this file. The use of named imports and the apparent project structure reflected in the import paths indicate good organization.
.env.example (1)
19-30: LGTM! OAuth environment variables added correctly.The new environment variables for GitHub, Google, and Discord OAuth integration have been added appropriately. The use of "REPLACE ME" as placeholder values is a good practice to indicate that these need to be replaced with actual credentials.
Consider adding a security reminder for handling credentials.
To enhance security awareness, consider adding a comment above these new variables to remind developers about the importance of keeping these credentials secure and not committing them to version control.
You could add a comment like this above the new variables:
+# OAuth Credentials (IMPORTANT: Keep these secret and never commit actual values to version control) # GITHUB GITHUB_CLIENT_ID="REPLACE ME" GITHUB_CLIENT_SECRET="REPLACE ME"Don't forget to update the documentation.
As per the PR checklist, the README.md hasn't been updated. Ensure that the documentation is updated to reflect these new environment variables and provide instructions on how to obtain and configure them.
To check if the README has been updated, you can run:
src/locales/ar/auth.json (1)
29-31: LGTM! Please verify the Arabic translation.The addition of the OAuth error message is consistent with the file structure and aligns with the PR objectives. The use of the
{{provider}}placeholder allows for dynamic content, which is good for flexibility.Could you please verify the accuracy of the Arabic translation? It should convey the message "Failed to create {{provider}} URL." If possible, have a native Arabic speaker review it to ensure it sounds natural and conveys the intended meaning correctly.
src/locales/sw/auth.json (1)
29-31: To ensure that the "oAuthError" entry is consistently added across all supported language files, let's verify its presence in everyauth.jsonfile.#!/bin/bash # Description: Count total auth.json files and those containing "oAuthError" # Total number of auth.json files total=$(rg --files --type json src/locales -g 'auth.json' | wc -l) # Number of auth.json files containing "oAuthError" with_oAuthError=$(rg --type json '"oAuthError"' src/locales -g 'auth.json' | wc -l) echo "Total auth.json files: $total" echo "auth.json files with 'oAuthError': $with_oAuthError"src/features/auth/PageLogin.tsx (2)
9-12: LGTM! New OAuth components imported correctly.The new OAuth-related components are imported properly using destructuring. This is a good practice for named exports.
Let's verify the existence and exports of the
OAuthLoginmodule:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the OAuthLogin module and its exports # Test 1: Check if the OAuthLogin file exists fd -t f OAuthLogin.tsx -d 3 # Test 2: Verify the exports of OAuthLoginButtonsGrid and OAuthLoginDivider rg -t typescript "export.*OAuthLoginButtonsGrid|export.*OAuthLoginDivider" src/features/auth
58-61: LGTM! OAuth components integrated seamlessly.The new OAuth components (
OAuthLoginButtonsGridandOAuthLoginDivider) are well-placed within the existing structure, enhancing the login interface without disrupting the current layout.To ensure proper rendering and integration, please run the following verification:
src/features/auth/OAuthLogin.tsx (3)
1-19: LGTM: Import statements are well-organized and relevant.The import statements are logically structured, separating third-party imports from custom imports. All imported modules appear to be necessary for the implemented functionality.
78-90: LGTM: OAuthLoginDivider component is well-implemented.The component efficiently renders a divider with "or" text when OAuth providers are enabled. It properly uses Chakra UI components and implements internationalization for the text.
1-90: Great implementation of OAuth login functionality.The file successfully implements three components (OAuthLoginButton, OAuthLoginButtonsGrid, and OAuthLoginDivider) that work together to provide a robust OAuth login interface. The code is well-structured, follows React best practices, and effectively handles various scenarios such as enabled/disabled providers and error states.
The implementation aligns well with the PR objectives of integrating Lucia oAuth providers. It provides a user-friendly interface for selecting different OAuth login options and handles the associated login flows efficiently.
A few minor suggestions for improvement have been made in previous comments, but overall, this is a solid implementation that enhances the authentication capabilities of the application.
src/env.mjs (1)
Line range hint
1-119: Overall approval with minor suggestions for improvement.The changes to
src/env.mjseffectively implement the necessary environment variables for OAuth integration with GitHub, Google, and Discord. The newzOptionalWithReplaceMefunction provides a clean way to handle optional environment variables with placeholder values.Key points:
- The implementation is consistent and follows good practices.
- The changes align well with the PR's objective of integrating OAuth providers.
- Minor suggestions have been made for improved documentation and readability.
These changes lay a solid foundation for the OAuth integration. Ensure that the corresponding OAuth logic is implemented correctly in other parts of the application to make full use of these environment variables.
src/features/auth/PageRegister.tsx (2)
17-20: LGTM: New OAuth components imported correctly.The new imports for
OAuthLoginButtonsGridandOAuthLoginDividerare correctly added and align with the PR's objective of integrating OAuth logins.
Line range hint
1-150: Overall integration looks good, consider additional improvements.The OAuth components have been seamlessly integrated into the existing registration page without disrupting the core functionality. This enhancement aligns well with the PR objectives.
Consider the following suggestions to further improve the implementation:
Error Handling: Ensure that OAuth-related errors are properly handled and displayed to the user. This might involve adding new error states or modifying the existing
toastErrorusage.Loading States: Add loading indicators for OAuth buttons to improve user experience during the authentication process.
Accessibility: Verify that the new OAuth components are accessible, including proper aria labels and keyboard navigation.
Responsive Design: Confirm that the layout works well on various screen sizes, especially considering the addition of new UI elements.
Testing: Update or add new unit and integration tests to cover the OAuth login functionality.
To ensure the OAuth integration is complete, let's verify the presence of necessary backend routes and configurations:
These checks will help ensure that the backend is properly set up to handle the new OAuth functionality.
package.json (1)
67-67: LGTM: New dependency added as expected.The addition of the "arctic" package (version 1.9.2) aligns with the PR objectives of integrating oAuth providers. This change looks good and should support the implementation of the new authentication features.
To ensure we're using the most up-to-date version, please run the following command:
Consider updating the README.md or project documentation to mention this new dependency and its purpose in the project.
src/server/config/oauth/providers/discord.ts (1)
27-27: Verify if PKCE is supported by Discord OAuthThe
shouldUseCodeVerifierflag is set totrue, indicating that PKCE (Proof Key for Code Exchange) is used in the OAuth flow. However, Discord's OAuth 2.0 implementation does not support PKCE. Using PKCE when it's not supported could lead to issues in the authentication process.Please confirm whether Discord supports PKCE. Refer to Discord's OAuth documentation or test the authentication flow. If PKCE is not supported, set
shouldUseCodeVerifiertofalse:export const discord: OAuthClient = { - shouldUseCodeVerifier: true, + shouldUseCodeVerifier: false,src/server/config/oauth/providers/google.ts (1)
52-52: Ensurefetchis available in the server environmentThe
fetchAPI is used without an import statement. Ensure thatfetchis available in your Node.js environment or import a compatible library likenode-fetch.Run the following script to verify if
fetchis available:If
fetchis not available, consider adding an import:+import fetch from 'node-fetch';src/server/config/oauth/providers/github.ts (2)
114-119: Ensure proper handling of users without an email address.The
nullif the user has no primary email or if the email is not provided by GitHub. Verify that your application can handle cases wherenullwithout causing errors or preventing user authentication.
2-2: Verify the 'arctic' module import for the GitHub OAuth client.The import statement
import { GitHub } from 'arctic';may be incorrect or unconventional. Please ensure that the'arctic'module exports theGitHubclass needed for OAuth integration. If not, consider importing from the appropriate module, such as'@octokit/oauth-app'or the official GitHub OAuth library.Run the following script to check if the
'arctic'module provides theGitHubexport:
| if (!stateFromCookie.success || stateFromCookie.data !== input.state) { | ||
| ctx.logger.warn('Wrong oAuth state'); | ||
| throw new TRPCError({ | ||
| code: 'BAD_REQUEST', | ||
| message: 'Wrong oAuth state', | ||
| }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use constant-time comparison for state to prevent timing attacks
The comparison between stateFromCookie.data and input.state uses a standard equality check (!==), which could be vulnerable to timing attacks. To enhance security, consider using a constant-time comparison function.
Apply this diff to use a constant-time comparison:
+ import { timingSafeEqual } from 'crypto';
if (
!stateFromCookie.success ||
- stateFromCookie.data !== input.state
+ !timingSafeEqual(
+ Buffer.from(stateFromCookie.data),
+ Buffer.from(input.state)
+ )
) {
ctx.logger.warn('Wrong oAuth state');
throw new TRPCError({
code: 'BAD_REQUEST',
message: 'Invalid oAuth state',
});
}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you explain a little more about that point? May be show references?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sure, I'd be happy to explain.
When comparing sensitive values like authentication tokens or state parameters, using standard equality operators (like !==) can make your application vulnerable to timing attacks. A timing attack exploits the time it takes to perform comparisons to infer information about the values being compared.
Standard equality checks may exit early when they find a mismatch, causing the comparison time to vary depending on where the first difference occurs. Attackers can measure these time differences to guess the correct value character by character.
By using a constant-time comparison function, you ensure that the comparison operation takes the same amount of time regardless of the input values, preventing attackers from gaining information through timing analysis.
In Node.js, you can use the crypto.timingSafeEqual function for this purpose. However, it's important to note that both buffers must be of the same length, or timingSafeEqual will throw an error. Here's how you might implement it:
import { timingSafeEqual } from 'crypto';
if (
!stateFromCookie.success ||
stateFromCookie.data.length !== input.state.length ||
!timingSafeEqual(
Buffer.from(stateFromCookie.data),
Buffer.from(input.state)
)
) {
ctx.logger.warn('Invalid OAuth state');
throw new TRPCError({
code: 'BAD_REQUEST',
message: 'Invalid OAuth state',
});
}In this code:
- We first check if the lengths of
stateFromCookie.dataandinput.stateare equal. - If they are, we use
timingSafeEqualto compare the buffers in constant time. - If the lengths are not equal or the comparison fails, we handle it as an invalid state.
References:
- Node.js Documentation - crypto.timingSafeEqual
- OWASP - Timing Attack
- CWE-208: Observable Timing Discrepancy
Let me know if you have any further questions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- src/features/auth/PageOAuthCallback.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/server/config/oauth/providers/discord.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/config/oauth/providers/github.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/config/oauth/providers/google.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/routers/oauth.tsx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- src/features/auth/PageOAuthCallback.tsx
- src/server/config/oauth/providers/discord.ts
- src/server/config/oauth/providers/github.ts
- src/server/config/oauth/providers/google.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/server/routers/oauth.tsx (1)
Learnt from: ivan-dalmet PR: BearStudio/start-ui-web#532 File: src/server/routers/oauth.tsx:208-249 Timestamp: 2024-09-30T11:19:46.786Z Learning: When the code logs 'Silent error for security reasons', maintain a generic error message to avoid exposing sensitive information.
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/server/routers/oauth.tsx (3)
18-57: LGTM: Secure implementation of authorization URL creationThe
createAuthorizationUrlprocedure is well-implemented. It correctly generates a state and code verifier, creates the authorization URL, and sets secure cookies with appropriate expiration times. The error handling for disabled providers is also in place.
243-251: Maintain generic error message for securityThe current implementation correctly uses a generic error message when an email already exists but cannot be safely linked. This aligns with the learning "When the code logs 'Silent error for security reasons', maintain a generic error message to avoid exposing sensitive information."
The current implementation is correct and follows best security practices by not revealing sensitive information in the error message.
1-281: Overall assessment: Well-implemented OAuth functionality with minor improvement suggestionsThe
oauth.tsxfile provides a robust implementation of OAuth functionality. It handles various scenarios effectively, including creating authorization URLs, validating logins, and managing user accounts. The code demonstrates good practices in error handling and security measures.A few minor improvements were suggested:
- Using constant-time comparison for state validation to enhance security against timing attacks.
- Standardizing error messages for disabled and unverified accounts to maintain consistency and avoid revealing account status information.
These suggestions aim to further enhance the security and user experience of the OAuth implementation. The current implementation of generic error messages for sensitive scenarios is commendable and aligns well with security best practices.
| if (!stateFromCookie.success || stateFromCookie.data !== input.state) { | ||
| ctx.logger.warn('Wrong oAuth state'); | ||
| throw new TRPCError({ | ||
| code: 'BAD_REQUEST', | ||
| message: 'Wrong oAuth state', | ||
| }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using constant-time comparison for state
The current implementation uses a standard equality check (!==) for comparing stateFromCookie.data and input.state. This could potentially be vulnerable to timing attacks. Consider using a constant-time comparison function to enhance security.
Here's a suggested implementation using crypto.timingSafeEqual:
import { timingSafeEqual } from 'crypto';
if (
!stateFromCookie.success ||
stateFromCookie.data.length !== input.state.length ||
!timingSafeEqual(
Buffer.from(stateFromCookie.data),
Buffer.from(input.state)
)
) {
ctx.logger.warn('Invalid OAuth state');
throw new TRPCError({
code: 'BAD_REQUEST',
message: 'Invalid OAuth state',
});
}This ensures that the comparison takes the same amount of time regardless of where the mismatch occurs, preventing potential timing attacks.
ivan-dalmet
force-pushed
the
feat/lucia-with-oauth
branch
from
43d69f2
to
93b2141
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 13
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (25)
src/app/oauth/[provider]/page.tsx (2)
3-5: Imports look good, consider grouping themThe necessary imports are present and correct. However, for better code organization, consider grouping the imports:
import { Suspense } from 'react'; import PageOAuthCallback from '@/features/auth/PageOAuthCallback';This groups the external library import (React) separately from the internal module import.
7-13: Page component implementation looks goodThe Page component is well-structured and follows React best practices. The use of Suspense for wrapping the PageOAuthCallback is appropriate for handling asynchronous content.
For consistency with TypeScript best practices, consider adding a return type to the function:
export default function Page(): JSX.Element { // ... existing implementation }This explicit return type can help with type checking and code clarity.
src/server/config/oauth/index.ts (1)
8-14: Excellent use of pattern matching, consider adding error handling.The
oAuthProviderfunction is well-implemented using pattern matching, which provides a clean and type-safe way to handle different OAuth providers. The use of.exhaustive()ensures that all cases are handled, which is great for maintaining type safety.However, consider adding explicit error handling for cases where an invalid or unsupported provider is passed to the function. This could be done by adding a
.otherwise()case or by throwing a custom error.Here's a suggested improvement:
export const oAuthProvider = (provider: OAuthProvider) => { return match(provider) .with('github', () => github) .with('google', () => google) .with('discord', () => discord) .otherwise(() => { throw new Error(`Unsupported OAuth provider: ${provider}`); }); };This change ensures that the function will throw a meaningful error if an unsupported provider is passed, making debugging easier.
src/server/router.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-24: Overall assessment: Changes look good and align with PR objectives.The addition of the OAuth router to this file is well-implemented and consistent with the existing structure. It successfully integrates the new OAuth functionality into the application's routing system.
A few points to note:
- Ensure that the
oauth.tsfile in thesrc/server/routers/directory is fully implemented with the necessary OAuth-related procedures.- Consider updating the comment above the
appRouterto mention the OAuth router, maintaining documentation consistency.- As mentioned in the PR objectives, remember to update the database schema before merging this PR.
To maintain the quality of the codebase, consider the following:
- Update the README.md file to reflect the new OAuth functionality, as indicated in the PR checklist.
- Create documentation for the new OAuth features, either in this repository or in the separate documentation repository mentioned in the PR checklist.
prisma/schema/auth.prisma (1)
1-8: LGTM! Consider minor enhancements for robustness and performance.The
OAuthAccountmodel is well-structured for handling OAuth integrations. The composite primary key onproviderandproviderUserIdensures uniqueness across different OAuth providers, and the relation to theUsermodel with cascading delete is appropriate.Consider the following suggestions for further improvement:
- Define
provideras an enum to restrict values to supported providers (e.g., GitHub, Google, Discord).- Add an index on
userIdto optimize queries when looking up a user's OAuth accounts.Here's how you could implement these suggestions:
+enum OAuthProvider { + GITHUB + GOOGLE + DISCORD +} model OAuthAccount { - provider String + provider OAuthProvider providerUserId String userId String user User @relation(references: [id], fields: [userId], onDelete: Cascade) @@id([provider, providerUserId]) + @@index([userId]) }src/server/config/oauth/utils.ts (3)
5-22: LGTM: Comprehensive OAuthClient type definition.The
OAuthClienttype is well-structured and covers the essential operations for OAuth integration. It uses modern TypeScript features and allows for flexibility with optional parameters and return values.Consider adding JSDoc comments to describe the purpose of each method and the
shouldUseCodeVerifierproperty. This would enhance code readability and maintainability.
24-25: LGTM: Concise utility function for OAuth callback URL.The
getOAuthCallbackUrlfunction is well-implemented, using a template literal to construct the callback URL based on the environment variable and the provided OAuth provider.Consider adding a check to ensure that
NEXT_PUBLIC_BASE_URLis set and valid. This could prevent runtime errors if the environment variable is missing or incorrectly configured.Example:
export const getOAuthCallbackUrl = (provider: OAuthProvider) => { if (!env.NEXT_PUBLIC_BASE_URL) { throw new Error('NEXT_PUBLIC_BASE_URL is not set'); } return `${env.NEXT_PUBLIC_BASE_URL}/oauth/${provider}`; };
1-25: Overall: Well-implemented OAuth utilities aligned with PR objectives.This file successfully introduces core OAuth functionality, aligning well with the PR objective of integrating Lucia oAuth providers with Artic. The
OAuthClienttype provides a comprehensive structure for OAuth implementations, and thegetOAuthCallbackUrlfunction offers a clean utility for generating callback URLs.As the OAuth integration progresses, consider the following architectural points:
- Ensure that the actual implementations of
OAuthClientfor different providers (GitHub, Google, Discord) follow this interface consistently.- Think about error handling and logging strategies across the OAuth flow, especially for scenarios like token validation failures or user retrieval errors.
- Consider implementing a factory pattern for creating
OAuthClientinstances based on the provider, which could simplify the usage of these utilities throughout the application..env.example (3)
19-21: Consider adding guidance for obtaining GitHub OAuth credentials.The addition of GitHub OAuth variables is consistent with the PR objectives. To improve developer experience, consider adding a comment with instructions or a link to GitHub's documentation on how to obtain these credentials.
Example:
# GITHUB +# To obtain these credentials, visit: https://github.com/settings/developers GITHUB_CLIENT_ID="REPLACE ME" GITHUB_CLIENT_SECRET="REPLACE ME"
23-25: Consider adding guidance for obtaining Google OAuth credentials.The addition of Google OAuth variables aligns with the PR objectives. To enhance developer onboarding, consider adding a comment with instructions or a link to Google's documentation on how to obtain these credentials.
Example:
# GOOGLE +# To obtain these credentials, visit: https://console.developers.google.com/ GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID="REPLACE ME" GOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET="REPLACE ME"
27-29: Consider adding guidance for obtaining Discord OAuth credentials.The addition of Discord OAuth variables is in line with the PR objectives. To facilitate easier setup for developers, consider adding a comment with instructions or a link to Discord's documentation on how to obtain these credentials.
Example:
# DISCORD +# To obtain these credentials, visit: https://discord.com/developers/applications DISCORD_CLIENT_ID="REPLACE ME" DISCORD_CLIENT_SECRET="REPLACE ME"src/lib/oauth/config.ts (4)
1-8: LGTM! Consider using a more specific import from React.The imports and type definitions look good. Using Zod for runtime type checking is a great practice. However, you could improve the React import slightly.
Consider changing the React import to be more specific:
-import { FC } from 'react'; +import type { FC } from 'react';This change explicitly imports FC as a type, which can help with tree-shaking and make the intent clearer.
10-32: LGTM! Consider environment-based configuration for provider enablement.The OAUTH_PROVIDERS constant is well-structured and type-safe. However, having all providers enabled by default might not be suitable for all environments.
Consider making the
isEnabledproperty dynamic based on environment variables. This would allow for easier configuration across different environments without code changes. For example:export const OAUTH_PROVIDERS = { github: { isEnabled: process.env.ENABLE_GITHUB_OAUTH === 'true', // ... other properties }, // ... other providers };Don't forget to update your .env files and documentation to reflect these new environment variables.
34-40: LGTM! Consider memoizing the result for performance.The OAUTH_PROVIDERS_ENABLED_ARRAY constant is well-implemented using functional programming techniques. It correctly filters and sorts the providers.
For a minor performance optimization, consider memoizing this array if it's used frequently in your application. You can use the
useMemohook in React components or a simple memoization function for non-React usage. For example:import { memoize } from 'lodash'; export const getOAuthProvidersEnabledArray = memoize(() => entries(OAUTH_PROVIDERS) .map(([key, value]) => ({ provider: key, ...value, })) .filter((p) => p.isEnabled) .sort((a, b) => a.order - b.order) );This way, the array is only recomputed when OAUTH_PROVIDERS changes, which should be rare.
1-40: Great implementation! Consider adding JSDoc comments for better documentation.Overall, this file is well-structured and serves its purpose effectively. It provides a centralized, type-safe configuration for OAuth providers using modern TypeScript features and functional programming techniques.
To further improve the file, consider adding JSDoc comments to the main exports. This will provide better documentation and improve IDE support. For example:
/** * Represents the available OAuth providers. */ export type OAuthProvider = z.infer<ReturnType<typeof zOAuthProvider>>; /** * Configuration for all OAuth providers. */ export const OAUTH_PROVIDERS = { // ... existing code }; /** * Array of enabled OAuth providers, sorted by their specified order. */ export const OAUTH_PROVIDERS_ENABLED_ARRAY = // ... existing codeThese comments will make the code more self-documenting and easier for other developers to understand and use.
src/locales/en/auth.json (1)
5-7: LGTM! Consider adding more specific OAuth error messages.The addition of the OAuth error message is well-structured and consistent with existing entries. It aligns with the PR objective of integrating OAuth logins.
Consider the following suggestions for further improvement:
- Add more specific error messages for different OAuth scenarios (e.g., connection issues, invalid credentials, etc.) to provide more detailed feedback to users.
- Consider alphabetical ordering of error messages for consistency, unless there's a specific reason for the current placement.
Example of additional error messages:
"oAuthError": { "title": "Failed to create the {{provider}} url", "connectionFailed": "Unable to connect to {{provider}}. Please try again later.", "invalidCredentials": "Invalid credentials for {{provider}}. Please check your login information.", "userCancelled": "Authentication with {{provider}} was cancelled." }src/locales/ar/auth.json (1)
29-31: LGTM! Consider adding a description for consistency.The new OAuth error feedback entry is correctly implemented and properly localized. The use of the {{provider}} placeholder is a good practice for dynamic content.
For consistency with other error feedbacks (e.g., loginError), consider adding a "description" field to provide more detailed information about the error.
Here's a suggestion to enhance consistency:
"oAuthError": { - "title": "فشل في إنشاء عنوان URL {{provider}}." + "title": "فشل في إنشاء عنوان URL {{provider}}.", + "description": "حدث خطأ أثناء محاولة الاتصال بـ {{provider}}. يرجى المحاولة مرة أخرى لاحقًا." }src/locales/sw/auth.json (2)
29-31: LGTM! Consider verifying the Swahili translation.The new OAuth error entry has been correctly added to the JSON structure. The use of a dynamic placeholder for the service provider ({{mtoa huduma}}) is consistent with localization best practices.
To ensure accuracy, consider having a native Swahili speaker verify the translation of "Imeshindwa kuunda url ya {{mtoa huduma}}".
Line range hint
1-52: Consider future OAuth-related translations.While the current changes are appropriate for the immediate needs, as OAuth integration progresses, you may need to add more OAuth-related translations. Consider planning for translations of common OAuth terms, error messages, or user instructions that might be needed in the future.
src/locales/fr/auth.json (1)
29-31: LGTM! Consider adding more specific error messages.The new OAuth error feedback entry is well-structured and correctly placed within the
login.feedbackssection. The translation is accurate and the use of the{{provider}}placeholder allows for dynamic content, which is great for supporting multiple OAuth providers as mentioned in the PR objectives.To further improve user experience, consider adding more specific error messages for different OAuth-related issues. For example:
"oAuthError": { "title": "Échec de la création de l'URL {{provider}}", "invalidProvider": "Fournisseur OAuth non pris en charge : {{provider}}", "missingCredentials": "Identifiants manquants pour {{provider}}", "networkError": "Erreur réseau lors de la connexion à {{provider}}" }This would allow for more precise error reporting and potentially easier troubleshooting for users.
src/features/auth/PageLogin.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-66: Summary: OAuth login integration successfully implemented.The changes to
PageLogin.tsxeffectively integrate OAuth login options into the existing login page. The modifications are minimal, focused, and align well with the PR objectives of adding OAuth login functionality. The new components are logically placed within the existing structure, enhancing the user interface without disrupting the overall flow.Consider adding a brief comment above the OAuth components to explain their purpose and relationship to the rest of the login flow. This can help future developers understand the component structure at a glance.
src/env.mjs (2)
30-31: LGTM! Discord OAuth environment variables added correctly. Minor suggestion for consistency.The Discord OAuth environment variables (
DISCORD_CLIENT_IDandDISCORD_CLIENT_SECRET) have been added correctly:
- They use the
zOptionalWithReplaceMeschema, allowing for optional values and placeholder handling.- The variables are added to both the
serverandruntimeEnvsections, maintaining consistency with the existing pattern.- The naming convention follows the established pattern in the file.
For consistency with other groups of environment variables, consider adding a newline before the Discord variables in both the
serverandruntimeEnvsections. This would improve readability and maintain the grouping pattern seen with other variables.Also applies to: 101-102
9-13: Summary: OAuth environment variables successfully integrated.The changes in this file effectively introduce OAuth support for GitHub, Google, and Discord:
- A new
zOptionalWithReplaceMeutility function has been added to handle optional environment variables with placeholders.- Environment variables for GitHub, Google, and Discord OAuth have been correctly added to both
serverandruntimeEnvsections.- The implementation is consistent with the existing code style and follows best practices.
These changes lay the groundwork for OAuth integration in the application, aligning with the PR objectives to add OAuth logins.
As the application now supports multiple OAuth providers, consider implementing a more scalable approach for adding new providers in the future. This could involve creating a separate configuration file for OAuth providers or using a factory pattern to generate provider-specific configurations.
Also applies to: 24-31, 95-102
src/features/auth/PageRegister.tsx (1)
17-20: LGTM! Consider grouping related imports.The new OAuth-related component imports are correctly added. To improve code organization, consider grouping related imports together. For example, you could place these new imports next to other auth-related imports.
import { useToastError } from '@/components/Toast'; +import { + OAuthLoginButtonsGrid, + OAuthLoginDivider, +} from '@/features/auth/OAuthLogin'; import { ROUTES_AUTH } from '@/features/auth/routes'; import { FormFieldsRegister, zFormFieldsRegister, } from '@/features/auth/schemas'; -import { - OAuthLoginButtonsGrid, - OAuthLoginDivider, -} from '@/features/auth/OAuthLogin';src/features/auth/PageOAuthCallback.tsx (1)
53-55: Enhance user experience for invalid parametersWhen the parameters are invalid, the component calls
notFound(), which displays a 404 page. Consider redirecting the user to the login page with an error message indicating that the OAuth callback parameters are invalid. This provides a clearer understanding for the user about what went wrong.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (22)
- .env.example (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- prisma/schema/auth.prisma (1 hunks)
- prisma/schema/user.prisma (1 hunks)
- src/app/oauth/[provider]/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/env.mjs (3 hunks)
- src/features/auth/OAuthLogin.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/features/auth/PageLogin.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/features/auth/PageOAuthCallback.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/features/auth/PageRegister.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/lib/oauth/config.ts (1 hunks)
- src/locales/ar/auth.json (1 hunks)
- src/locales/en/auth.json (1 hunks)
- src/locales/fr/auth.json (1 hunks)
- src/locales/sw/auth.json (1 hunks)
- src/server/config/oauth/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/config/oauth/providers/discord.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/config/oauth/providers/github.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/config/oauth/providers/google.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/config/oauth/utils.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/router.ts (2 hunks)
- src/server/routers/oauth.tsx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- package.json
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (3)
src/features/auth/PageOAuthCallback.tsx (2)
Learnt from: ivan-dalmet PR: BearStudio/start-ui-web#532 File: src/features/auth/PageOAuthCallback.tsx:43-45 Timestamp: 2024-09-30T11:07:14.833Z Learning: When suggesting changes to `useEffect` dependencies in React components, ensure that removing dependencies doesn't cause React Hook errors about missing dependencies.Learnt from: ivan-dalmet PR: BearStudio/start-ui-web#532 File: src/features/auth/PageOAuthCallback.tsx:29-34 Timestamp: 2024-09-27T14:35:18.793Z Learning: In the `onSuccess` callback of TRPC mutations, `data` is guaranteed to be defined, so it's not necessary to check for undefined.src/server/config/oauth/providers/google.ts (1)
Learnt from: ivan-dalmet PR: BearStudio/start-ui-web#532 File: src/server/config/oauth/providers/google.ts:47-47 Timestamp: 2024-09-30T11:33:57.170Z Learning: In asynchronous functions, it's acceptable to return a promise directly without adding `await`, unless we need to handle errors or process the result immediately.src/server/routers/oauth.tsx (1)
Learnt from: ivan-dalmet PR: BearStudio/start-ui-web#532 File: src/server/routers/oauth.tsx:208-249 Timestamp: 2024-09-30T11:19:46.786Z Learning: When the code logs 'Silent error for security reasons', maintain a generic error message to avoid exposing sensitive information.
🔇 Additional comments (30)
src/app/oauth/[provider]/page.tsx (2)
1-1: Correct use of 'use client' directiveThe 'use client' directive is appropriately placed at the top of the file, marking this as a client-side component. This is suitable for an OAuth callback page that may need to interact with browser APIs.
1-13: Overall, excellent implementation of OAuth callback pageThis file successfully implements the OAuth callback page, aligning well with the PR objectives. It follows modern React and Next.js 13+ practices, including the use of 'use client' directive, Suspense for asynchronous content, and appropriate file naming for routing.
The code is concise, focused, and well-structured. The minor suggestions provided (import grouping and adding a return type) are for consistency and clarity, but do not impact the functionality.
Great job on this implementation!
src/server/config/oauth/index.ts (2)
1-6: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-organized.The imports are correctly structured and include all necessary dependencies for the OAuth provider configuration. The use of
ts-patternfor pattern matching is a good choice for type-safe matching.
1-14: Great implementation of OAuth provider configuration.This file successfully implements the OAuth provider configuration, aligning well with the PR objectives. The code is concise, readable, and leverages TypeScript's type system effectively. The use of pattern matching with
ts-patternis a great choice for handling different OAuth providers in a type-safe manner.A minor suggestion for improvement has been made regarding error handling for unsupported providers. Overall, this implementation provides a solid foundation for integrating Lucia oAuth providers into the application.
To ensure that this implementation is correctly used throughout the project, let's verify the usage of
oAuthProvider:This script will help us verify that the
oAuthProviderfunction is correctly imported and used across the project, ensuring that the OAuth integration is properly implemented.✅ Verification successful
Verified usage of
oAuthProvideracross the project.The
oAuthProviderfunction is correctly imported and utilized insrc/server/routers/oauth.tsx, ensuring that the OAuth integration is properly implemented throughout the project.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of oAuthProvider function across the project # Search for imports of oAuthProvider echo "Checking imports of oAuthProvider:" rg --type typescript "import.*oAuthProvider.*from.*server/config/oauth" # Search for usage of oAuthProvider function echo "\nChecking usage of oAuthProvider function:" rg --type typescript "oAuthProvider\s*\("Length of output: 363
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of oAuthProvider function across the project # Search for imports of oAuthProvider echo "Checking imports of oAuthProvider:" rg -g "*.ts*" "import.*oAuthProvider.*from.*server/config/oauth" # Search for usage of oAuthProvider function echo "\nChecking usage of oAuthProvider function:" rg -g "*.ts*" "oAuthProvider\s*\("Length of output: 733
src/server/router.ts (2)
4-4: LGTM: OAuth router import added correctly.The import statement for
oauthRouteris correctly placed and follows the established convention for router imports in this file. This addition aligns with the PR objective of integrating Lucia oAuth providers.
16-16: LGTM: OAuth router integrated correctly into appRouter.The
oauthRouteris correctly integrated into theappRouterconfiguration, maintaining alphabetical order. This change successfully adds OAuth routing capabilities to the main application router, aligning with the PR objective.Regarding the past review comment about a missing
oauth.tsfile:It appears that the issue has been resolved, as the import statement for
oauthRouteris now present. However, to ensure everything is in order, we should verify the implementation.Let's run a quick check to confirm the
oauth.tsfile exists and has the basic structure:#!/bin/bash # Verify the oauth.ts file and its basic structure echo "Checking for oauth.ts file..." fd --type f "oauth\.ts$" src/server/routers echo "Verifying basic structure of oauthRouter..." ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export const oauthRouter = createTRPCRouter({$$$})' src/server/routers/oauth.tsprisma/schema/user.prisma (3)
16-25: Formatting improvements look good.The alignment of property declarations enhances readability and maintains consistency throughout the User model.
16-28: Changes align well with PR objectives and enhance OAuth capabilities.The modifications to the User model, including the formatting improvements and the addition of the
oauthproperty, are consistent with the PR's goal of integrating Lucia oAuth providers. These changes effectively update the database schema to support OAuth functionality.A few recommendations for the PR author:
- Ensure that the necessary database migrations are created and applied correctly.
- Update any affected queries or services that interact with the User model.
- Consider updating the README.md file to reflect these changes, as it was marked as incomplete in your PR checklist.
- If not already done, create documentation for the new OAuth functionality, either in this PR or as a separate issue in the documentation repository.
28-28: Newoauthproperty added for OAuth integration.The addition of the
oauthproperty of typeOAuthAccount[]aligns with the PR objective of integrating Lucia oAuth providers. This allows for associating multiple OAuth accounts with a user, which is a good practice for supporting multiple authentication methods.However, there are a few points to consider:
- The
OAuthAccountmodel is not defined in this file. Ensure it's defined in another Prisma schema file or consider adding it to this file for better organization.- This change represents a significant update to the database schema. Make sure to run the necessary migrations and update any affected queries or services.
- Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this field for better documentation.
To ensure the
OAuthAccountmodel is properly defined, run the following script:src/server/config/oauth/utils.ts (1)
1-3: LGTM: Import statements are appropriate.The import statements are relevant to the OAuth functionality being implemented. They bring in necessary dependencies from the environment variables, OAuth configuration, and the application context.
.env.example (1)
19-30: LGTM! Remember to update the database schema.The additions to the
.env.examplefile are appropriate and align well with the PR objectives of integrating Lucia oAuth providers. The structure and formatting of the new sections are consistent with the existing file.As mentioned in the PR objectives, please ensure that the required database schema update is completed before merging this PR.
To verify the database schema update, please run the following command:
This command will search for any OAuth-related models in the Prisma schema files. If the output shows a new OAuth model, it confirms that the database schema has been updated as required.
✅ Verification successful
Database Schema Update Verified
The Prisma schema includes the
OAuthAccountmodel as required. The database schema update has been successfully implemented.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for Prisma schema changes related to OAuth # Test: Search for OAuth-related model in the Prisma schema rg --type-add 'prisma:*.prisma' --type prisma 'model.*OAuth'Length of output: 109
src/locales/fr/auth.json (1)
Line range hint
1-53: Verify corresponding English translations.The French translations for OAuth errors have been added successfully. To ensure consistency across languages, please confirm that the corresponding English translations have also been updated in the appropriate file (likely
src/locales/en/auth.json).Run the following script to check for the presence of OAuth error messages in the English translation file:
If the script doesn't return any results, please update the English translations accordingly.
✅ Verification successful
The corresponding English translations for OAuth errors have been successfully updated and are present in
src/locales/en/auth.json.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for OAuth error messages in English translation file # Test: Search for OAuth-related entries in the English auth.json file rg --type json 'oAuthError' src/locales/en/auth.jsonLength of output: 74
src/features/auth/PageLogin.tsx (2)
9-12: LGTM: New OAuth components imported correctly.The new imports for
OAuthLoginButtonsGridandOAuthLoginDividerare well-structured and align with the PR's objective of integrating OAuth logins.
58-61: LGTM: OAuth components integrated effectively.The
OAuthLoginButtonsGridandOAuthLoginDividercomponents are well-placed in the JSX, providing a clear separation between traditional login and OAuth options. This aligns with the PR objectives and follows good UX practices.Could you confirm if these components require any props? If so, please ensure they are properly passed. You can verify this by checking the component definitions:
✅ Verification successful
LGTM: OAuth components integrated effectively.
The
OAuthLoginButtonsGridandOAuthLoginDividercomponents are correctly implemented without requiring any props, ensuring a clean integration that aligns with the PR objectives and follows good UX practices.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if OAuthLoginButtonsGrid and OAuthLoginDivider require any props # Test: Search for the component definitions ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export function OAuthLoginButtonsGrid($_) { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export function OAuthLoginDivider($_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 181
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for OAuthLoginButtonsGrid and OAuthLoginDivider component definitions using various declaration styles # Search for functional component declarations ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export function OAuthLoginButtonsGrid($_) { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export const OAuthLoginButtonsGrid = ($_): JSX.Element => { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export function OAuthLoginDivider($_) { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export const OAuthLoginDivider = ($_): JSX.Element => { $$$ }' # Search for class-based component declarations ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export class OAuthLoginButtonsGrid extends React.Component<$_, $_> { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export class OAuthLoginDivider extends React.Component<$_, $_> { $$$ }' # Check if components are imported from external modules rg --ignore-file .gitignore 'OAuthLoginButtonsGrid' src/ rg --ignore-file .gitignore 'OAuthLoginDivider' src/Length of output: 1357
src/env.mjs (3)
9-13: LGTM! Addressing the past discussion on placeholder values.The
zOptionalWithReplaceMefunction is a good approach to handle placeholder values in environment variables. It allows for optional values while transforming the 'REPLACE ME' placeholder toundefined. This is consistent with the existing code style and use of Zod for schema validation.Regarding the past discussion:
- The current implementation allows for checking if the value exists or not in production, which is beneficial.
- Transforming 'REPLACE ME' to
undefinedprevents initializing code with a known wrong value.- This approach provides flexibility in both development and production environments.
24-25: LGTM! GitHub OAuth environment variables added correctly.The GitHub OAuth environment variables (
GITHUB_CLIENT_IDandGITHUB_CLIENT_SECRET) have been added correctly:
- They use the
zOptionalWithReplaceMeschema, allowing for optional values and placeholder handling.- The variables are added to both the
serverandruntimeEnvsections, maintaining consistency with the existing pattern.- The naming convention follows the established pattern in the file.
Also applies to: 95-96
27-28: LGTM! Google OAuth environment variables added correctly.The Google OAuth environment variables (
GOOGLE_CLIENT_IDandGOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET) have been added correctly:
- They use the
zOptionalWithReplaceMeschema, allowing for optional values and placeholder handling.- The variables are added to both the
serverandruntimeEnvsections, maintaining consistency with the existing pattern.- The naming convention follows the established pattern in the file.
Also applies to: 98-99
src/features/auth/PageRegister.tsx (3)
94-97: Verify handling of OAuth and traditional registration conflicts.The OAuth components are well-integrated, preserving the existing email-based registration functionality. However, it's important to ensure that the application can handle potential conflicts between OAuth and traditional registration methods.
Please confirm the following:
- How does the application handle cases where a user tries to register with an email that's already associated with an OAuth account?
- Is there a mechanism to link OAuth accounts with existing email-based accounts?
- Has the mentioned database schema update been implemented to support these new OAuth functionalities?
Consider adding comments in the code to explain the flow and any conflict resolution strategies.
Line range hint
1-146: Summary: OAuth integration looks good, with a few points to addressThe changes to
PageRegister.tsxsuccessfully introduce OAuth login options while preserving the existing email-based registration flow. This aligns well with the PR objectives. Here are the key points to address:
- Consider grouping related imports for better code organization.
- Verify if the OAuth components (
OAuthLoginButtonsGridandOAuthLoginDivider) require any props for configuration.- Ensure proper handling of potential conflicts between OAuth and traditional registration methods.
- Confirm that the necessary database schema updates have been implemented to support the new OAuth functionalities.
- Consider adding comments to explain the registration flow and any conflict resolution strategies.
Once these points are addressed, the changes will be more robust and better integrated with the existing system.
94-97: LGTM! Verify if OAuth components require any props.The OAuth components are well-placed in the registration flow, providing users with alternative login options before the traditional registration form. This aligns with the PR objective of integrating OAuth logins.
Could you please verify if the
OAuthLoginButtonsGridandOAuthLoginDividercomponents require any props for configuration or customization? If they do, ensure they are properly passed.✅ Verification successful
OAuth Components Do Not Require Props
The
OAuthLoginButtonsGridandOAuthLoginDividercomponents are correctly integrated without the need for any props. They function as intended within the registration and login flows.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if OAuthLoginButtonsGrid and OAuthLoginDivider components accept any props # Test: Search for the component definitions echo "Searching for OAuthLoginButtonsGrid component definition:" ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export function OAuthLoginButtonsGrid($_) { $$$ }' echo "\nSearching for OAuthLoginDivider component definition:" ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export function OAuthLoginDivider($_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 427
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if OAuthLoginButtonsGrid and OAuthLoginDivider components accept any props using alternative definition patterns echo "Searching for OAuthLoginButtonsGrid defined as a constant arrow function:" ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export const OAuthLoginButtonsGrid = ($_): JSX.Element => { $$$ }' echo "\nSearching for OAuthLoginButtonsGrid defined as a class component:" ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export class OAuthLoginButtonsGrid extends React.Component<$_> { $$$ }' echo "\nSearching for OAuthLoginButtonsGrid as a default export function:" ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export default function OAuthLoginButtonsGrid($_): JSX.Element { $$$ }' echo "\nSearching for OAuthLoginButtonsGrid as a default export class component:" ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export default class OAuthLoginButtonsGrid extends React.Component<$_> { $$$ }' echo "\nSearching for OAuthLoginDivider defined as a constant arrow function:" ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export const OAuthLoginDivider = ($_): JSX.Element => { $$$ }' echo "\nSearching for OAuthLoginDivider defined as a class component:" ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export class OAuthLoginDivider extends React.Component<$_> { $$$ }' echo "\nSearching for OAuthLoginDivider as a default export function:" ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export default function OAuthLoginDivider($_): JSX.Element { $$$ }' echo "\nSearching for OAuthLoginDivider as a default export class component:" ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export default class OAuthLoginDivider extends React.Component<$_> { $$$ }'Length of output: 2085
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate import statements and usage of OAuthLoginButtonsGrid and OAuthLoginDivider components echo "Searching for import statements of OAuthLoginButtonsGrid:" rg 'import\s+.*OAuthLoginButtonsGrid' echo "\nSearching for import statements of OAuthLoginDivider:" rg 'import\s+.*OAuthLoginDivider' echo "\nSearching for usage of OAuthLoginButtonsGrid with props in JSX:" rg '<OAuthLoginButtonsGrid\s+[^>]*>' src/ echo "\nSearching for usage of OAuthLoginDivider with props in JSX:" rg '<OAuthLoginDivider\s+[^>]*>' src/Length of output: 933
src/features/auth/PageOAuthCallback.tsx (2)
35-41: Redirection logic inonSuccesshandler is correctly implementedThe implementation appropriately redirects users based on their authorizations.
42-45: Error handling inonErroris properly managedThe
onErrorcallback correctly displays an error message and redirects the user to the login page.src/features/auth/OAuthLogin.tsx (2)
21-54: Well-implementedOAuthLoginButtoncomponentYour
OAuthLoginButtoncomponent correctly handles the OAuth login flow, including mutation handling and error reporting. The use oftrpc,useRouter, anduseToastErroris appropriate and enhances the user experience.
78-90: Clean and conditional rendering ofOAuthLoginDividerThe
OAuthLoginDividercomponent is implemented cleanly, and it properly checks for enabled OAuth providers before rendering. This ensures that the UI remains consistent and prevents unnecessary elements from being displayed.src/server/config/oauth/providers/discord.ts (2)
50-76: Consider adding error handling for network and parsing exceptionsIf the
fetchcall fails due to network issues, or ifuserResponse.json()throws an exception due to invalid JSON, these errors may not be caught, potentially causing unhandled promise rejections. It's advisable to wrap these operations in a try-catch block to handle exceptions gracefully.
1-85: LGTM!The overall implementation correctly handles Discord OAuth integration with proper error handling and data validation.
src/server/config/oauth/providers/google.ts (1)
72-73:⚠️ Potential issueHandle potential errors when parsing JSON response
If
userResponse.json()fails due to invalid JSON, it will throw an uncaught error. To handle this gracefully, wrap the JSON parsing in a try-catch block.Apply this diff to enhance error handling:
+ let userData; + try { + userData = await userResponse.json(); + } catch (error) { + ctx.logger.error('Failed to parse JSON response from Google', error); + throw new TRPCError({ + code: 'INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR', + message: 'Failed to parse response from Google', + }); + } - const userData = await userResponse.json(); ctx.logger.info('User data retrieved from Google');Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/server/config/oauth/providers/github.ts (1)
117-117: Verify handling of potential nullThe
nullif neitherprimaryEmail?.emailnorgitHubUser.data.emailis available. If your application requires the user's email, ensure that you handle cases where the email is missing.Please confirm that the absence of an email address is appropriately managed in downstream code. If an email is mandatory, consider adding a check to prompt the user or halt the process when an email is not available.
src/server/routers/oauth.tsx (2)
87-93: Use constant-time comparison for state to prevent timing attacksThe comparison between
stateFromCookie.dataandinput.stateuses a standard equality check (!==), which may be vulnerable to timing attacks. To enhance security, consider using a constant-time comparison function.
245-250: Maintain generic error messages for security reasonsGreat job on using a generic error message when the email already exists but the account cannot be safely linked. This helps in preventing the exposure of sensitive information.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Describe your changes
Add Lucia oAuth provides with Artic
Checklist
pnpm storybookcommand and everything is working(If you cannot update the french language, just let us know in the PR description)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores