Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request for Updating MOEA/D-EGO Implementation in PlatEMO #162

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

liazhao5
Copy link

It has come to our notice that the MOEA/D-EGO method proposed by Prof. Zhang in 2010, which is included in PlatEMO, has been frequently reported by users to contain bugs in its code. These issues often prevent users from reproducing the results as described in the original paper.

In light of these reports, we have taken the initiative to modify the existing code of MOEA/D-EGO as included in PlatEMO. Our revised version addresses the aforementioned issues, ensuring that users can achieve the expected results without encountering the previously reported problems.

We kindly request you to consider replacing the current implementation of MOEA/D-EGO in PlatEMO with our revised version. We have included our contact email in the new version so that we can continue to monitor and resolve any future issues reported by users.

In addition, we have a small suggestion: could we possibly add a directory .\PlatEMO\Algorithms\surrogate_models\ to store the codes for commonly-used surrogate models? PlatEMO already includes many model-based methods, and having different methods utilize the same codes for surrogate modeling would be more efficient and user-friendly.

@yhm-me
Copy link

yhm-me commented Oct 29, 2024

I also support the suggestion and hope the author can provide a version that allows users to compare the differences between algorithms except for the surrogates.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants