Update README.md: typo & grammar improvements #622
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Title typo correction: Sesson -> Session - Added missing definite article "the" several places - Moved closing angle bracket inside the back ticks - Rephrased "Template does the following" to "This template [ ... ]" - Capitalized first word in the bullet list - Added minor grammar improvements - Added **bold** formatting to "Note:" - Rephrased the last sentence for readability
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description:
While checking out a PR linking this repo in the MicrosoftDocs/windowsserverdocs repository, I noticed the title typo and some English grammar inconsistencies. I propose to improve some of the text in this README.md file for clarity and readability.
Changes proposed:
Additional notes:
I tried to find a better phrasing for the sentence "Click the button below to deploy:", but I was too uncertain of the difference between them to be sure that the resulting sentence would differentiate them correctly. Feel free to suggest how that sentence can be improved.
Also note my changes in the last sentence I have made changes to; feel free to ask me to rephrase that part to make sure the intended meaning is kept unchanged.