Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clean up some workarounds for old upstream bugs #40199

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 18, 2024

Conversation

anomiex
Copy link
Contributor

@anomiex anomiex commented Nov 14, 2024

Proposed changes:

Other information:

  • Have you written new tests for your changes, if applicable?
  • Have you checked the E2E test CI results, and verified that your changes do not break them?
  • Have you tested your changes on WordPress.com, if applicable (if so, you'll see a generated comment below with a script to run)?

Jetpack product discussion

None

Does this pull request change what data or activity we track or use?

No

Testing instructions:

  • CI happy?
  • Stuff still work?

* We no longer need to care about nanoid v3 thinking "browser === esm",
  because the GB package that had that dep no longer does.
* Various `jsx-a11y/label-has-associated-control` ignores referring to
  jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y#869 seem to be fixed now that #39736
  requires we use `htmlFor`. The one place still needing an ignore is
  jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y#578 instead.
* Remove reference to deleted renovate issue.
* Move reference to a Storybook bug to the code actually implementing
  the workaround.
* Update Storybook FAQ reference.
* Remove TODO references to a fixed Storybook bug (and fix a wrong prop
  in one story).
* Remove workaround for WordPress/WordPress-Coding-Standards#2390.
@anomiex anomiex added [Status] Needs Review To request a review from fellow Jetpack developers. Label will be renamed soon. [Type] Janitorial [Pri] Normal labels Nov 14, 2024
@anomiex anomiex requested a review from a team November 14, 2024 21:20
@anomiex anomiex self-assigned this Nov 14, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Are you an Automattician? Please test your changes on all WordPress.com environments to help mitigate accidental explosions.

  • To test on WoA, go to the Plugins menu on a WordPress.com Simple site. Click on the "Upload" button and follow the upgrade flow to be able to upload, install, and activate the Jetpack Beta plugin. Once the plugin is active, go to Jetpack > Jetpack Beta, select your plugin, and enable the update/cleanup-some-old-workarounds branch.

    • For jetpack-mu-wpcom changes, also add define( 'JETPACK_MU_WPCOM_LOAD_VIA_BETA_PLUGIN', true ); to your wp-config.php file.
  • To test on Simple, run the following command on your sandbox:

    bin/jetpack-downloader test jetpack update/cleanup-some-old-workarounds
    
    bin/jetpack-downloader test jetpack-mu-wpcom-plugin update/cleanup-some-old-workarounds
    

Interested in more tips and information?

  • In your local development environment, use the jetpack rsync command to sync your changes to a WoA dev blog.
  • Read more about our development workflow here: PCYsg-eg0-p2
  • Figure out when your changes will be shipped to customers here: PCYsg-eg5-p2

Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your PR!

When contributing to Jetpack, we have a few suggestions that can help us test and review your patch:

  • ✅ Include a description of your PR changes.
  • ✅ Add a "[Status]" label (In Progress, Needs Team Review, ...).
  • ✅ Add testing instructions.
  • ✅ Specify whether this PR includes any changes to data or privacy.
  • ✅ Add changelog entries to affected projects

This comment will be updated as you work on your PR and make changes. If you think that some of those checks are not needed for your PR, please explain why you think so. Thanks for cooperation 🤖


The e2e test report can be found here. Please note that it can take a few minutes after the e2e tests checks are complete for the report to be available.


Follow this PR Review Process:

  1. Ensure all required checks appearing at the bottom of this PR are passing.
  2. Choose a review path based on your changes:
    • A. Team Review: add the "[Status] Needs Team Review" label
      • For most changes, including minor cross-team impacts.
      • Example: Updating a team-specific component or a small change to a shared library.
    • B. Crew Review: add the "[Status] Needs Review" label
      • For significant changes to core functionality.
      • Example: Major updates to a shared library or complex features.
    • C. Both: Start with Team, then request Crew
      • For complex changes or when you need extra confidence.
      • Example: Refactor affecting multiple systems.
  3. Get at least one approval before merging.

Still unsure? Reach out in #jetpack-developers for guidance!

Copy link
Contributor

@tbradsha tbradsha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks reasonable.

@anomiex anomiex merged commit 62e385b into trunk Nov 18, 2024
74 checks passed
@anomiex anomiex deleted the update/cleanup-some-old-workarounds branch November 18, 2024 16:41
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the [Status] Needs Review To request a review from fellow Jetpack developers. Label will be renamed soon. label Nov 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants