Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inconsistency of botanical taxonomic classifiation #33

Closed
djtfmartin opened this issue Aug 19, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed

Inconsistency of botanical taxonomic classifiation #33

djtfmartin opened this issue Aug 19, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@djtfmartin
Copy link
Member

migrated from: https://code.google.com/p/ala/issues/detail?id=146
date: Thu Aug 8 16:43:19 2013
author: moyesyside


Original Issue reported by Project Member Reported by [email protected], Sep 1, 2011 - https://code.google.com/p/ala-portal/issues/detail?id=142

Project Member Reported by [email protected], Sep 1, 2011
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.
Results set page
http://bie.ala.org.au/search?q=Pteridium+esculentum
Pteridium esculentum Cockayne (G. Forst.)

2.
Species Profile page
http://bie.ala.org.au/species/Pteridium%20esculentum
Pteridium esculentum (G. Forst.) Cockayne

3.
Classification
http://bie.ala.org.au/species/Pteridium%20esculentum#classification
Pteridium esculentum : Bracken
1.
Occurrence records or single occurrence record
species: Pteridium esculentum | Austral Bracken
http://biocache.ala.org.au/occurrences/taxa/urn:lsid:biodiversity.org.au:apni.taxon:313681
http://biocache.ala.org.au/occurrences/f7463506-90a0-458b-905a-a219f172e275

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Expected, should use APNI as a model.
http://www.anbg.gov.au/cgi-bin/apni?taxon_id=2875

Pteridium esculentum (G.Forst.) Cockayne

Instead:
Pteridium esculentum Cockayne (G. Forst.)
or
Pteridium esculentum (G. Forst.) Cockayne
or
Pteridium esculentum : Bracken
or
Pteridium esculentum | Austral Bracken

Please use labels and text to provide additional information.
Reported by Arthur Chapman.

Sep 1, 2011 Project Member #1 [email protected]
From Jim Croft.

The first page is a mistake - either in the data or in the rendering. The zoological code allows free standing parenthetical authors, but the botanical code does not.

jim

Sep 1, 2011 Project Member #2 [email protected]
Another comment from Jim:

If you are going to render plant names without authurs, which is most instances is quite acceptable, remove the whole author string.

jim

@nickdos
Copy link
Contributor

nickdos commented Jan 19, 2015

This issue was moved to AtlasOfLivingAustralia/bie-service#1

@nickdos nickdos closed this as completed Jan 19, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants