Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 28, 2018. It is now read-only.

Inconsistency of botanical taxonomic classifiation #1

Open
nickdos opened this issue Jan 19, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

Inconsistency of botanical taxonomic classifiation #1

nickdos opened this issue Jan 19, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@nickdos
Copy link
Contributor

nickdos commented Jan 19, 2015

From @djtfmartin on August 19, 2014 10:38

migrated from: https://code.google.com/p/ala/issues/detail?id=146
date: Thu Aug 8 16:43:19 2013
author: moyesyside


Original Issue reported by Project Member Reported by [email protected], Sep 1, 2011 - https://code.google.com/p/ala-portal/issues/detail?id=142

Project Member Reported by [email protected], Sep 1, 2011
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.
Results set page
http://bie.ala.org.au/search?q=Pteridium+esculentum
Pteridium esculentum Cockayne (G. Forst.)

2.
Species Profile page
http://bie.ala.org.au/species/Pteridium%20esculentum
Pteridium esculentum (G. Forst.) Cockayne

3.
Classification
http://bie.ala.org.au/species/Pteridium%20esculentum#classification
Pteridium esculentum : Bracken
1.
Occurrence records or single occurrence record
species: Pteridium esculentum | Austral Bracken
http://biocache.ala.org.au/occurrences/taxa/urn:lsid:biodiversity.org.au:apni.taxon:313681
http://biocache.ala.org.au/occurrences/f7463506-90a0-458b-905a-a219f172e275

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Expected, should use APNI as a model.
http://www.anbg.gov.au/cgi-bin/apni?taxon_id=2875

Pteridium esculentum (G.Forst.) Cockayne

Instead:
Pteridium esculentum Cockayne (G. Forst.)
or
Pteridium esculentum (G. Forst.) Cockayne
or
Pteridium esculentum : Bracken
or
Pteridium esculentum | Austral Bracken

Please use labels and text to provide additional information.
Reported by Arthur Chapman.

Sep 1, 2011 Project Member #1 [email protected]
From Jim Croft.

The first page is a mistake - either in the data or in the rendering. The zoological code allows free standing parenthetical authors, but the botanical code does not.

jim

Sep 1, 2011 Project Member #2 [email protected]
Another comment from Jim:

If you are going to render plant names without authurs, which is most instances is quite acceptable, remove the whole author string.

jim

Copied from original issue: AtlasOfLivingAustralia/biocache-hubs#33

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants