Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: implement cchecksum for ~2x faster checksumming #17

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Dec 10, 2024

Conversation

BobTheBuidler
Copy link
Contributor

What I did

fixes: #

How I did it

How to verify it

Checklist

  • All changes are completed
  • New test cases have been added
  • Documentation has been updated

@BobTheBuidler BobTheBuidler marked this pull request as ready for review December 6, 2024 19:14
@antazoey antazoey changed the title feat: implement cchecksum for ~2x faster checksumming feat: implement checksum for ~2x faster checksumming Dec 6, 2024
@antazoey antazoey changed the title feat: implement checksum for ~2x faster checksumming feat: implement cchecksum for ~2x faster checksumming Dec 6, 2024
@antazoey
Copy link
Member

antazoey commented Dec 6, 2024

question: would it possible to update the one in eth-utils instead?

@BobTheBuidler
Copy link
Contributor Author

BobTheBuidler commented Dec 7, 2024

Not sure yet. I opened a similar PR implementing this lib on the web3.py repo and if that's the direction the eth foundation wants me to swim in I will. Until then, I decided it best to leave the cython implementation fully separate.

But based on the stuff I've seen in that repo, they tend to choose readability over compute optimizations

setup.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
setup.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@antazoey antazoey merged commit 978a91d into ApeWorX:main Dec 10, 2024
21 checks passed
@BobTheBuidler BobTheBuidler deleted the patch-1 branch December 10, 2024 18:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants