-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 69
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
IF: Update signature-provider parsing for base64 BLS public keys #2066
Changes from 2 commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -42,6 +42,9 @@ class signature_provider_plugin_impl { | |
std::tuple<std::string, std::string, std::string> parse_spec(const std::string& spec) const { | ||
auto delim = spec.find("="); | ||
EOS_ASSERT(delim != std::string::npos, chain::plugin_config_exception, "Missing \"=\" in the key spec pair"); | ||
// public_key can be base64 encoded with trailing `=` | ||
while( spec.size() > delim+1 && spec[delim+1] == '=' ) | ||
++delim; | ||
auto pub_key_str = spec.substr(0, delim); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. won't There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yes, which like the example comment shows is rather ugly. We will likely move to base64url in the future partly do to this. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. So should we do something like this:
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. No, The public key is There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Oh, OK. No spaces possible, right? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Correct, no spaces allowed. |
||
auto spec_str = spec.substr(delim + 1); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Will this be out of range if |
||
|
||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you add in the comment what
spec
looks like when the public_key has trailing=
?