-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 68
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
migrate to new platform-cache-workflow
to manage Dockerfile caching in CI
#1703
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a thought, while doing this update should we update the
platform
s in thematrix:
sections throughout our workflows to be dynamic from theplatform-cache-workflow
like done inph_backward_compatibility
?platform: ${{fromJSON(needs.platform-cache.outputs.platform-list)}}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks like that is the right approach now, but that's only because there is a 1:1 between all the platform files and all the platforms we're going to build leap-dev on. That may not always be true. For example, we may choose not to support building on Ubuntu 20, but still support running the reproducible build on Ubuntu 20. In such a scenario we'd still need a
ubuntu20
platform defined in theplatforms
/platform-list
, but its purpose would only be for testing. So usingplatform-list
here wouldn't work.(I expected to already need to make use of this for the reproducible builds: I expected I'd need a special ubuntu20+cmake3.27 platform to run
ctest
on since cmake3.27 is what is used to build. Shockingly, that doesn't appear to be the case)I feel like we probably need some sort of .json file that gets sucked in at the start of the workflow that defines these copy pasted repetitive items like
[ubuntu20, ubuntu22]
. (It gets more unwieldy with the upcoming reproducible workflow additions)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh, hm, I see I did plumb that through elsewhere as
platform-list
..leap/.github/workflows/performance_harness_run.yaml
Line 103 in 381b3ed
leap/.github/workflows/build.yaml
Line 50 in 381b3ed
In this case here, I guess it could be changed to
platform-list
for consistencyThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually those are from the work I did earlier to use
platform-matrix
which you renamed toplatform-list
in this PR with your move to theplatform-cache-workflow
.I'm fine with leaving the
[ubuntu20, ubuntu22]
was just asking since this PR was working in that space. You called out a good example where this won't be 1:1, so that's good enough of a reason to leave it. I just wish there was a way to not have it hardcoded everywhere. It makes updating the workflows a bit tedious and error prone when adopting or dropping a platform.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should come up with something better; but at least let's look at how the reproducible one works before noodling on it more. (and, at the danger of overthinking future proofing, how something like an ARM build or a macOS build would look)