Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
IF: Implement message propagation #1676
IF: Implement message propagation #1676
Changes from 4 commits
4b6928a
577a7cd
64f36af
33b23e6
fd61028
481b936
c5295b3
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I feel the return type or name of
bool qc_chain::update_high_qc
should be changed. Even though you updated_high_qc
but returnsfalse
if proposal_id() is empty. It is hard to follow in the callerprocess_new_view
whyfalse
indicates the view should be propagated. Or use another dedicated method to decide whether to propagate. This might have prevented the initial infinite loop bug.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the best is to return whether it was updated, and only strictly update when we are going to propagate. For that I need some help in formalizing the edge cases where e.g. the proposal_id() is empty.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You can use range erase to avoid the while loop for simplicity and potential invalid itrs doing the loop, something like
_seen_votes_store.get<by_seen_votes_proposal_height>().erase(sv_begin_itr, sv_end_itr);