Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI: Rework ipt format check #2297

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2024
Merged

CI: Rework ipt format check #2297

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2024

Conversation

t-b
Copy link
Collaborator

@t-b t-b commented Nov 18, 2024

We now name that step "IPT checks" as we also do linting. And this means we should also rename tools/ipt-format.sh.

Close #511

@t-b t-b requested a review from Garados007 November 18, 2024 14:22
@t-b t-b force-pushed the feature/2297-add-linting branch from 8db9c0c to e6fbaca Compare November 18, 2024 14:24
We now name that step "IPT checks" as we also do linting. And this means
we should also rename tools/ipt-format.sh.
@t-b t-b force-pushed the feature/2297-add-linting branch from e6fbaca to 501bbda Compare November 18, 2024 16:02
@Garados007 Garados007 assigned t-b and unassigned Garados007 Nov 20, 2024
@t-b t-b merged commit 5fcb28b into main Nov 20, 2024
20 checks passed
@t-b t-b deleted the feature/2297-add-linting branch November 20, 2024 12:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Switch to always use inline parameter declarations
2 participants