Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add run type and beam type metadata for async and MC QC #1838

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 7, 2024

Conversation

knopers8
Copy link
Collaborator

@knopers8 knopers8 commented Dec 6, 2024

QC-1188, QC-1002

Seeing no available run type in the surrounding scripts, I naively assume that absolutely all runs in async and MC are considered to be of type PHYSICS.

QC-1188, QC-1002

Seeing no available run type in the surrounding scripts, I naively assume that absolutely all runs in async and MC are considered to be of type PHYSICS.
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 6, 2024

REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION RELEASES:
To request your PR to be included in production software, please add the corresponding labels called "async-" to your PR. Add the labels directly (if you have the permissions) or add a comment of the form (note that labels are separated by a ",")

+async-label <label1>, <label2>, !<label3> ...

This will add <label1> and <label2> and removes <label3>.

The following labels are available
async-2023-pbpb-apass4
async-2023-pp-apass4
async-2024-pp-apass1
async-2022-pp-apass7
async-2024-pp-cpass0
async-2024-PbPb-apass1
async-2024-ppRef-apass1

@chiarazampolli
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes, we do not process calibration runs with this script. We might have cosmics, VdM etc, but these are also physics.

@chiarazampolli chiarazampolli merged commit a3ab0ee into master Dec 7, 2024
13 checks passed
@chiarazampolli chiarazampolli deleted the qc-runtype-beamtype branch December 7, 2024 16:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants