Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update mult config analysis-testing-data.json #1544

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jezwilkinson
Copy link
Contributor

This update to the multiplicity-table configuration in the PbPb testing workflow is required for compatibility with PR O2Physics#5003 (tags daily-20240307 and newer); current version crashes during initialisation of the multiplicity task on newer O2Physics versions.

for compatibility with O2Physics#5003
Copy link

REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION RELEASES:
To request your PR to be included in production software, please add the corresponding labels called "async-" to your PR. Add the labels directly (if you have the permissions) or add a comment of the form (note that labels are separated by a ",")

+async-label <label1>, <label2>, !<label3> ...

This will add <label1> and <label2> and removes <label3>.

The following labels are available
async-2022-pp-apass4
async-2023-pbpb-apass
async-2023-pp-apass1
async-data
async-mc
async-2022-pp-apass6

@benedikt-voelkel
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the update @jezwilkinson
Do you know if AliceO2Group/O2Physics#5003 will be taken for any new apass production? If so, this needs to be labelled accordingly.

@benedikt-voelkel
Copy link
Contributor

Hej @jezwilkinson
We changed the logic for the AnalysisQC quite a bit (see #1590). And at this point, the multiplicity-table config is back to a relatively basic config.
Is the more complex config needed in data? If so, could you get in touch with me directly, e.g. via mattermost to discuss this?
Thanks a lot!

@benedikt-voelkel
Copy link
Contributor

I am closing this now @jezwilkinson, please re-open if needed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants