Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chartkick 5.1.0 #13

Open
wants to merge 14 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Chartkick 5.1.0 #13

wants to merge 14 commits into from

Conversation

elalemanyo
Copy link
Member

@elalemanyo elalemanyo commented Oct 8, 2024

  • Update Chartkick
  • Change branch to main
  • Change ruby versions
  • Replace webpack with esbuild

@rstammer
Copy link
Contributor

rstammer commented Oct 8, 2024

Thanks for taking care 👏

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# frozen_string_literal: true
module IRuby
module Chartkick
VERSION = "0.3.1"
VERSION = "0.5.1"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a reason to skip v0.4.0? Would be more logical to jump to this, wouldn't it?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The idea was to leave it similar to the chartkick version 😅

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for pointing out 👍 I somehow disagree here, because I think keeping a coherent own version history makes more sense to avoid confusion - but - don't worry - I can live with that decision 😉 🫶

Copy link
Contributor

@rstammer rstammer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for taking care! Looks good to me 👍

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# frozen_string_literal: true
module IRuby
module Chartkick
VERSION = "0.3.1"
VERSION = "0.5.1"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for pointing out 👍 I somehow disagree here, because I think keeping a coherent own version history makes more sense to avoid confusion - but - don't worry - I can live with that decision 😉 🫶

@@ -1,14 +1,13 @@
{
"name": "iruby-chartkick",
"scripts": {
"build": "webpack ./vendor/assets/javascripts/main.js --output-path='./vendor/assets/javascripts/' --output-filename=bundle.js --mode=production"
"build": "esbuild ./vendor/assets/javascripts/main.js --bundle --outfile=./vendor/assets/javascripts/bundle.js --minify"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Gemfile.lock Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants