Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade org.aspectj:aspectjweaver from 1.9.20.1 to 1.9.22 #1309

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

wajda
Copy link
Contributor

@wajda wajda commented Apr 16, 2024

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade org.aspectj:aspectjweaver from 1.9.20.1 to 1.9.22.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 6 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 23 days ago, on 2024-03-23.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

@wajda wajda requested a review from cerveada as a code owner April 16, 2024 01:22
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Apr 16, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Copy link

JaCoCo code coverage report

There is no coverage information present for the Files changed

Total Project Coverage 35.71% 🍏

@wajda wajda closed this Apr 16, 2024
@wajda wajda deleted the snyk-upgrade-8fdb7d9ffa6fba2416144bfd2221854a branch April 16, 2024 08:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants