Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix regrid for the radiation module #345

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 21, 2024

Conversation

wjge
Copy link
Member

@wjge wjge commented Feb 15, 2024

When the regrid() remakes any levels, the radiation module will fail.

@baperry2
Copy link
Collaborator

@wjge Can you update the PelePhysics submodule here to the version from your PelePhysics PR?

@@ -288,6 +288,16 @@ PeleLM::regrid(int lbase, amrex::Real time, bool initial)
}

finest_level = new_finest;

#ifdef PELE_USE_RADIATION
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a comment: it looks like all the radiation stuff is controlled at both compile time (PELE_USE_RADIATION) and the runtime (do_rad_solve). Now that the radiation module is part of PelePhysics, I think we can remove the #ifdefs and just always compile with radiation and use the runtime flag to determine whether the model gets used. That would make CI a bit simpler. @wjge do you agree? If so I can do this in a future PR.

Copy link
Member Author

@wjge wjge Feb 16, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now the PeleLMeX example 'tests' do not cover any EB case with soot and radiation modules on for compiling. I am running two production runs (one without EB, one with EB) right now to see whether there is any other issue. Of course, the physics and chemistry might cause other issues that are not related to the solvers. I would recommend we have a EB test with soot and radiation modules on first before getting rid of the macro. What do you think?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Despite the lack of test coverage for EB with radiation, removing the macro would allow some parts of the CI like the clang-tidy check to cover more of the radiation stuff. And if the runtime options default to off, having these compiled in but inactive shouldn't affect any cases being run. It would be great to add EB tests for these capabilities if you have suitable cases though! In any event, this is tangential to the present PR, which appears to be working with the PelePhysics update so I will approve and merge.

@wjge
Copy link
Member Author

wjge commented Feb 16, 2024

@wjge Can you update the PelePhysics submodule here to the version from your PelePhysics PR?

Could you tell me the best workflow for that? Change the CI to checkout the PR in PelePhysics?

@baperry2
Copy link
Collaborator

Could you tell me the best workflow for that? Change the CI to checkout the PR in PelePhysics?

This is done as a regular git commit. In your branch of PeleLMeX, go into the Submodules/PelePhysics directory, then checkout the appropriate git hash or branch of PelePhysics that includes your updates for PelePhysics, then, from the PeleLMeX directory you can just do git add Submodules/PelePhysics, git commit -m "message", and git push as usual.

@baperry2 baperry2 merged commit 795b0c3 into AMReX-Combustion:development Feb 21, 2024
24 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants