Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Experiment] Nanobind #127

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: development
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

ax3l
Copy link
Member

@ax3l ax3l commented May 4, 2023

What would it take to migrate to nanobind?

Pro's

See advertising, all great :)

Love the

  • speed & size
  • separate headers for features
  • non-header-only approach
  • C++17 and newer only
  • faster builds: no LTO needed anymore

Notes / Con's

  • limited official compiler support (Clang, GCC, MSVC), especially no coverage yet for GPU (Nvidia NVCC & NVHPC, AMD ROCm, Intel OneAPI)
  • still many warnings (e.g., Wshadow, Wpedantic) in base lib
  • currently, limited public docs improved :)

What would it take to migrate to nanobind?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant