Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: let the upload run when no board is selected #10

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 17, 2024
Merged

Conversation

2lambda123
Copy link
Owner

IDE2 must not disable the upload from the UI when no board is selected. Otherwise, IDE2 does not receive the no FQBN error from the CLI and cannot cannot
suggest selecting a board via the Tools > Board menu.

Closes arduino/arduino-ide#1714

Motivation

Change description

Other information

Reviewer checklist

  • PR addresses a single concern.
  • The PR has no duplicates (please search among the Pull Requests before creating one)
  • PR title and description are properly filled.
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

IDE2 must not disable the upload from the UI when no board is selected.
Otherwise, IDE2 does not receive the `no FQBN` error from
the CLI and cannot cannot
suggest selecting a board via the `Tools` > `Board` menu.

Closes arduino/arduino-ide#1714

Signed-off-by: Akos Kitta <[email protected]>
Copy link

Unable to locate .performanceTestingBot config file

Copy link

cr-gpt bot commented Apr 17, 2024

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

Copy link

Processing PR updates...

@trafico-bot trafico-bot bot added the 🔍 Ready for Review Pull Request is not reviewed yet label Apr 17, 2024
Copy link

codesyncapp bot commented Apr 17, 2024

Check out the playback for this Pull Request here.

Copy link

git-greetings bot commented Apr 17, 2024

Thanks @2lambda123 for opening this PR!

For COLLABORATOR only :

  • To add labels, comment on the issue
    /label add label1,label2,label3

  • To remove labels, comment on the issue
    /label remove label1,label2,label3

Copy link

quine-bot bot commented Apr 17, 2024

👋 Figuring out if a PR is useful is hard, hopefully this will help.

  • @2lambda123 has been on GitHub since 2019 and in that time has had 1992 public PRs merged
  • Don't you recognize them? They've been here before 🎉
  • Here's a good example of their work: HeyGenClone
  • From looking at their profile, they seem to be good with Shell and Jupyter Notebook.

Their most recently public accepted PR is: #9

Copy link

@gitginie gitginie bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@2lambda123
Thank you for your contribution to this repository! We appreciate your effort in opening pull request.
Happy coding!

Copy link

codeautopilot bot commented Apr 17, 2024

Your organization has reached the subscribed usage limit. You can upgrade your account by purchasing a subscription at Stripe payment link

Disclaimer: This comment was entirely generated using AI. Be aware that the information provided may be incorrect.

Current plan usage: 156.20%

Have feedback or need help?
Discord
Documentation
[email protected]

@labels-and-badges labels-and-badges bot added NO JIRA This PR does not have a Jira Ticket PR:size/XS Denotes a Pull Request that changes 0-9 lines. release This PR is a release labels Apr 17, 2024
Copy link

git-greetings bot commented Apr 17, 2024

PR Details of @2lambda123 in arduino-arduino-ide :

OPEN CLOSED TOTAL
7 3 10

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 17, 2024

Warning

Rate Limit Exceeded

@2lambda123 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 17 minutes and 2 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.
Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.
Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 411716d and 3c5c014.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@2lambda123 2lambda123 merged commit 9c6bba0 into main Apr 17, 2024
16 of 23 checks passed
@trafico-bot trafico-bot bot added ✨ Merged Pull Request has been merged successfully and removed 🔍 Ready for Review Pull Request is not reviewed yet labels Apr 17, 2024
Copy link

@gitginie gitginie bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@2lambda123
Thank you for your contribution to this repository! We appreciate your effort in closing pull request.
Happy coding!

@trafico-bot trafico-bot bot added the 🔍 Ready for Review Pull Request is not reviewed yet label Apr 17, 2024
Comment on lines 74 to +79
async checkUserFieldsDialog(forceOpen = false): Promise<boolean> {
const key = this.selectedFqbnAddress();
if (!key) {
return false;
// Let the upload continue without an FQBN and the CLI fail instead of disabling the upload from IDE.
// https://github.com/arduino/arduino-ide/issues/1714
return true;

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The decision to allow the upload to continue without an FQBN (Fully Qualified Board Name) and rely on the CLI to fail might lead to a less intuitive user experience. Users might not understand why their upload failed if the error messages from the CLI are not clear or are not properly relayed back to the IDE's user interface.

Recommended Solution: Consider implementing a more user-friendly error handling mechanism that checks for the presence of an FQBN before attempting the upload. If the FQBN is missing, provide a clear and informative error message directly in the IDE, guiding the user on how to resolve the issue. This approach can help in reducing confusion and improving the overall user experience.

@trafico-bot trafico-bot bot removed the ✨ Merged Pull Request has been merged successfully label Apr 17, 2024
@quine-bot quine-bot bot mentioned this pull request Apr 17, 2024
4 tasks
Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @2lambda123 - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Docstrings: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.

return false;
// Let the upload continue without an FQBN and the CLI fail instead of disabling the upload from IDE.
// https://github.com/arduino/arduino-ide/issues/1714
return true;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (code_refinement): Consider handling potential CLI failures more gracefully.

Allowing the CLI to fail without prior checks might lead to less user-friendly error handling. It could be beneficial to implement a more graceful fallback or error message to improve the user experience.

Suggested change
return true;
if (!fqbn) {
console.error("FQBN is missing. Upload cannot proceed.");
return false;
}
return true;

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
NO JIRA This PR does not have a Jira Ticket PR:size/XS Denotes a Pull Request that changes 0-9 lines. 🔍 Ready for Review Pull Request is not reviewed yet release This PR is a release size/XS
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Upload fails silently when no board is selected
1 participant