You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I don't see a lot of reasons to differentiate the category based on how the instruction is encoded for other than re-encoding which is already handled by different data and logic, from an exploration perspective its better if those instructions are categorized by their signature/class/menmonic.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Instructions like vpclmulqdq might report a different instruction category based on the encoding rather then semantics.
Example: https://gist.github.com/ZehMatt/8e52b8d01fc110b113e57ca401bf18a1/revisions , another instruction I found is also vpclmulqdq, there might be more.
I don't see a lot of reasons to differentiate the category based on how the instruction is encoded for other than re-encoding which is already handled by different data and logic, from an exploration perspective its better if those instructions are categorized by their signature/class/menmonic.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: