Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

iTerm(special): Handle asynchronous operations #3206

Open
Tracked by #3203
zFernand0 opened this issue Oct 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
Tracked by #3203

iTerm(special): Handle asynchronous operations #3206

zFernand0 opened this issue Oct 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority-low Legit issue but cosmetic or nice-to-have

Comments

@zFernand0
Copy link
Member

zFernand0 commented Oct 10, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

The initial implementation of iTerms always waits for the response from z/OS.

Describe the solution you'd like

Ideally, users are able to run a command and specify whether or not they want to wait for the output 😋
And if they decide not to wait, users should be able to specify if they want to get delayed responses OR just forget about the output of the executed command. 😋

One option could be to make users prefix the command with special command modifiers:

  • Prefix with :async for delayed responses
  • Prefix with :forget if the user is not interested in the output of the command

Describe alternatives you've considered

3270 😅

Additional context

Related:

Copy link

Thank you for raising this enhancement request.
The community has 90 days to vote on it.
If the enhancement receives at least 10 upvotes, it is added to our development backlog.
If it receives fewer votes, the issue is closed.

@zFernand0 zFernand0 changed the title iTerm(special): Handle asynchronous operations (delayed response | submit & forget) iTerm(special): Handle asynchronous operations Oct 10, 2024
@JTonda JTonda added the priority-low Legit issue but cosmetic or nice-to-have label Oct 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority-low Legit issue but cosmetic or nice-to-have
Projects
Status: Low Priority
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants