Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix: Implement better lambda normalization #498

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Fix: Implement better lambda normalization #498

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

asr2003
Copy link

@asr2003 asr2003 commented Dec 8, 2024 •
edited
Loading

/claim #379
CLoses #379

@algora-pbc algora-pbc bot mentioned this pull request Dec 8, 2024
Open
@asr2003
Copy link
Author

asr2003 commented Dec 17, 2024

@pshirshov @neko-kai Any reviews on it?

@pshirshov
Copy link
Member

Will do.

@pshirshov
Copy link
Member

pshirshov commented Dec 17, 2024 •
edited
Loading

If I modify Lambda this way:

  final case class Lambda(input: List[SymName.LambdaParamName], output: AbstractReference) extends AbstractReference {
    println(s"$input => $this")

And run a test like

    "xxx" in {
      ///println(`LTT[_]`[List])
      println(LTT[IT1[List]])
    }

It will print List(LambdaParamName(0,1,1)) => λ %1:0 → List[+1:0]. The inversion didn't happen, the innermost lambda has 1 as depth index, while it should be 0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@pshirshov pshirshov Awaiting requested review from pshirshov pshirshov is a code owner

@neko-kai neko-kai Awaiting requested review from neko-kai neko-kai is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
🙋 Bounty claim
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Better lambda normal form
2 participants
@asr2003 @pshirshov