-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Suggestion for specific settings to improve subphasing #32
Comments
As you have got a well split of 4 subgenomes, you can finally input the assignments of 4 subgenomes via
|
Thanks a lot! It just worked perfect! Is there a way I can specify the color to each subgenome? |
just found the right commands, please ignore the message above, but the nobel thing still holds true :-) |
It should be because S1/S2 have no speciefic kmers, and for s3, speciefic kmers distributed unevenly. At present, there may be no simple options to work well. You may try again to input one combination of two or three subgenomes every time, and check whether the results are reiable. |
Hi
Thanks a lot for this awesome tool!
I am trying to phase an allopentaploid genome which we expect to have 4 subgenomes. Although the clustering works very well, I having trouble to adjust the settings to get the fours subgenomes correctly identified. Suphaser identifies normally 3 subgenomes, but if I set -nsg 4 it does not identify correctly the 4th subgenome based on the clustering but it splits one subgenome wrongly. Please below.
Using -nsg 3:
Using -nsg 4:
Using only the set of chromosomes from S1/2 and s3 from the two subgnomes that should be split:
Ideally, I would like to have in one run the 4 subgenomes correctly identified and split. Any suggestions are welcome!
Best
André
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: