You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 29, 2020. It is now read-only.
User: @Ocramius
Created On: 2014-05-08T00:47:57Z
Updated At: 2014-05-08T00:47:57Z
Body
load modules A, B - configs order is A, B.
load modules A -> B - configs order is A, B.
Could you clarify a bit?
Comment
User: @Ocramius
Created On: 2014-07-28T00:25:09Z
Updated At: 2014-07-28T00:25:09Z
Body
Assigning to @EvanDotPro for review
Comment
User: @adamlundrigan
Created On: 2014-11-16T23:49:22Z
Updated At: 2014-11-17T00:20:34Z
Body
What is the specific use case this is trying to solve? I've built a lot of ZF2 modules and I've never come across the need to dynamically load sub-modules like this. To me it adds an extra level of complexity to solve a problem that, in my view, doesn't really need fixing....but perhaps I'm missing the point. I guess it can be a bit annoying, for instance to install ZfcUser you have to remember to put both ZfcBase and ZfcUser in your list of loaded modules, but I've not found a need to work around that personally.
Comment
User: @turrsis
Created On: 2014-11-20T09:43:02Z
Updated At: 2014-11-20T09:43:02Z
Body @adamlundrigan This is analog of the Zend\ModuleManager\Feature\DependencyIndicatorInterface - somebody use it
Comment
User: @Ocramius
Created On: 2014-11-20T12:01:38Z
Updated At: 2014-11-20T12:01:38Z
Body
Yes, though I would suggest reading #3443
The dependency indicator interface is just a pre-flight check that can be disabled, and it was implemented that way because loading separate modules automatically is a bit too magic (IMO).
Comment
User: @turrsis
Created On: 2014-11-25T08:44:12Z
Updated At: 2014-11-25T08:44:12Z
Body
This is inverse task of zendframework/zendframework#5651
Sometimes you may need load submodules imperatively, and main module settings should be overwriten by childrens.
Comment
User: @Ocramius
Created On: 2014-11-27T01:18:01Z
Updated At: 2014-11-27T01:18:01Z
Body @turrsis yes, and I'm arguing that the use-case is very limited. I'll leave this up to @EvanDotPro: maybe this makes sense now that composer fits 95% of use-cases.
Comment
User: @Ocramius
Created On: 2014-12-17T13:23:08Z
Updated At: 2014-12-17T13:23:08Z
Body @EvanDotPro can you review and state your opinion on this? I can handle the rebase/merge stuff myself if you like it.
Comment
User: @weierophinney
Created On: 2015-02-09T21:41:01Z
Updated At: 2015-02-09T21:41:01Z
Body
Not yet reviewed by @EvanDotPro , but it does need to be rebased if we do decide to merge.
Comment
User: @turrsis
Created On: 2015-02-23T09:51:11Z
Updated At: 2015-02-23T09:51:11Z
Body @weierophinney rebased.
Comment
User: @weierophinney
Created On: 2015-02-23T18:39:27Z
Updated At: 2015-02-23T18:39:27Z
Body @EvanDotPro Can you please review this and at the very least comment on whether you think we should merge or not?
Comment
User: @EvanDotPro
Created On: 2015-03-18T14:53:21Z
Updated At: 2015-03-18T14:53:21Z
Body @turrsis So, this might be because I haven't taken enough time to understand the approach taken, but I just don't quite understand a couple things about this approach. First, it seems to hold an extra copy or reference to the ModuleEvent? Second, could you explain the changes around the loadFinished property? Overall, I understand and appreciate what you're trying to do (a delayed module-load), I'm just hung up on the implementation details at this point. /cc @weierophinney@Ocramius
Comment
User: @weierophinney
Created On: 2015-03-18T15:00:30Z
Updated At: 2015-03-18T15:00:30Z
Body
I'm going to delay this, then; I think we need more discussion of the feature.
Comment
User: @EvanDotPro
Created On: 2015-03-18T15:13:56Z
Updated At: 2015-03-18T15:13:56Z
Body
Sounds good. Sorry for the delay, @turrsis!
Comment
User: @turrsis
Created On: 2015-03-19T12:34:03Z
Updated At: 2015-03-19T12:34:03Z
Body
copy of the ModuleEvent : I don't understand this too :) , fixed. loadFinished : if you increment and decrement this variable - it should be integer
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm writing an academe system where I have two (2) interrelated modules Staff and Faculty (both are sub-component for Employees module - where abstract account setting resides).
Following are my module namespaces:
Employees
Employees\Staff
Employees\Faculty
Is it best fit (practice) to use only the base namespace "Employees" in the modules.config.php file to include the Staff and Faculty module dependencies - since composer can traverse the module settings using getAutoloaderConfig() method?
I've tried to decouple Faculty module from Employees module because I need the faculty services only for FacultyTeachingLoad module and ClassScheduling module - both are deployed on a separate application.
Any thoughts about this approach or some advice on how to properly structure it. Thanks.
This issue has been moved from the
zendframework
repository as part of the bug migration program as outlined here - http://framework.zend.com/blog/2016-04-11-issue-closures.htmlOriginal Issue: https://api.github.com/repos/zendframework/zendframework/issues/6239
User: @turrsis
Created On: 2014-05-07T19:40:25Z
Updated At: 2015-03-19T12:34:03Z
Body
Allow load modules (from
Module::init()
) after current module.Analog of zendframework/zendframework#5651, but:
load modules
A, B
- configs order isA, B
.load modules
A -> B
- configs order isA, B
.Comment
User: @Ocramius
Created On: 2014-05-08T00:47:57Z
Updated At: 2014-05-08T00:47:57Z
Body
Could you clarify a bit?
Comment
User: @Ocramius
Created On: 2014-07-28T00:25:09Z
Updated At: 2014-07-28T00:25:09Z
Body
Assigning to @EvanDotPro for review
Comment
User: @adamlundrigan
Created On: 2014-11-16T23:49:22Z
Updated At: 2014-11-17T00:20:34Z
Body
What is the specific use case this is trying to solve? I've built a lot of ZF2 modules and I've never come across the need to dynamically load sub-modules like this. To me it adds an extra level of complexity to solve a problem that, in my view, doesn't really need fixing....but perhaps I'm missing the point. I guess it can be a bit annoying, for instance to install ZfcUser you have to remember to put both ZfcBase and ZfcUser in your list of loaded modules, but I've not found a need to work around that personally.
Comment
User: @turrsis
Created On: 2014-11-20T09:43:02Z
Updated At: 2014-11-20T09:43:02Z
Body
@adamlundrigan This is analog of the
Zend\ModuleManager\Feature\DependencyIndicatorInterface
- somebody use itComment
User: @Ocramius
Created On: 2014-11-20T12:01:38Z
Updated At: 2014-11-20T12:01:38Z
Body
Yes, though I would suggest reading #3443
The dependency indicator interface is just a pre-flight check that can be disabled, and it was implemented that way because loading separate modules automatically is a bit too magic (IMO).
Comment
User: @turrsis
Created On: 2014-11-25T08:44:12Z
Updated At: 2014-11-25T08:44:12Z
Body
This is inverse task of zendframework/zendframework#5651
Sometimes you may need load submodules imperatively, and main module settings should be overwriten by childrens.
Comment
User: @Ocramius
Created On: 2014-11-27T01:18:01Z
Updated At: 2014-11-27T01:18:01Z
Body
@turrsis yes, and I'm arguing that the use-case is very limited. I'll leave this up to @EvanDotPro: maybe this makes sense now that composer fits 95% of use-cases.
Comment
User: @Ocramius
Created On: 2014-12-17T13:23:08Z
Updated At: 2014-12-17T13:23:08Z
Body
@EvanDotPro can you review and state your opinion on this? I can handle the rebase/merge stuff myself if you like it.
Comment
User: @weierophinney
Created On: 2015-02-09T21:41:01Z
Updated At: 2015-02-09T21:41:01Z
Body
Not yet reviewed by @EvanDotPro , but it does need to be rebased if we do decide to merge.
Comment
User: @turrsis
Created On: 2015-02-23T09:51:11Z
Updated At: 2015-02-23T09:51:11Z
Body
@weierophinney rebased.
Comment
User: @weierophinney
Created On: 2015-02-23T18:39:27Z
Updated At: 2015-02-23T18:39:27Z
Body
@EvanDotPro Can you please review this and at the very least comment on whether you think we should merge or not?
Comment
User: @EvanDotPro
Created On: 2015-03-18T14:53:21Z
Updated At: 2015-03-18T14:53:21Z
Body
@turrsis So, this might be because I haven't taken enough time to understand the approach taken, but I just don't quite understand a couple things about this approach. First, it seems to hold an extra copy or reference to the ModuleEvent? Second, could you explain the changes around the loadFinished property? Overall, I understand and appreciate what you're trying to do (a delayed module-load), I'm just hung up on the implementation details at this point. /cc @weierophinney @Ocramius
Comment
User: @weierophinney
Created On: 2015-03-18T15:00:30Z
Updated At: 2015-03-18T15:00:30Z
Body
I'm going to delay this, then; I think we need more discussion of the feature.
Comment
User: @EvanDotPro
Created On: 2015-03-18T15:13:56Z
Updated At: 2015-03-18T15:13:56Z
Body
Sounds good. Sorry for the delay, @turrsis!
Comment
User: @turrsis
Created On: 2015-03-19T12:34:03Z
Updated At: 2015-03-19T12:34:03Z
Body
copy of the
ModuleEvent
: I don't understand this too :) , fixed.loadFinished
: if you increment and decrement this variable - it should be integerThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: