You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Feature request noted, on the list for when I get back into maintaining the package.
In the meantime, you could always create an NMF model class with your own initialization, and then use the predict function to alternately update w and h until stopping criteria are satisfied.
Unless you are providing a pre-trained model of sorts as an initialization, it is rarely advisable to use a non-random initialization. If you're trying to improve on the base random initialization, I'd be curious to hear what you're doing, but I have not found any distribution or normalization algorithm that consistently improves the loss of solutions over what is currently in place.
Thanks for the great package!
Do you think you could add a feature for
RcppML::nmf
where I could initialize the values ofw
,d
, andh
myself?Thanks,
Eric.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: