You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I am retuning on this one as my provider now finally (!) uses the protobuf format.
However, I see some attribute issues with me wrt to gtfs, stop_id became stopId, stop_time_update became stopTimeUpdate, etc.
Would you possibly know if this is a local choice, e.g. could it be that the French provider uses his own attrib names?
I am asking because I would like to try to align your work with what I have but not sure if this is provider-specific.
Alternative is that I just convert the protobuf to a json and people can work from there on
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, I am retuning on this one as my provider now finally (!) uses the protobuf format.
However, I see some attribute issues with me wrt to gtfs, stop_id became stopId, stop_time_update became stopTimeUpdate, etc.
Would you possibly know if this is a local choice, e.g. could it be that the French provider uses his own attrib names?
I am asking because I would like to try to align your work with what I have but not sure if this is provider-specific.
Alternative is that I just convert the protobuf to a json and people can work from there on
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: