Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Approach to artifact manifest seems to be out of date #144

Closed
waynr opened this issue Sep 25, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Approach to artifact manifest seems to be out of date #144

waynr opened this issue Sep 25, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@waynr
Copy link
Contributor

waynr commented Sep 25, 2023

In #115 a draft version of artifact support was repeatedly mentioned. If you click to that link, the file no longer exists.

There is a very long and contentious discussion about this in the image-spec repo. I didn't read the entire discussion, but there is a good summary as to what motivated the change. They also provide guidance on using the long-standing image manifest type as an artifact manifest type, essentially codifying a convention established by the community of registries and clients over the years:

To this end, I think it makes sense for this repo to at least support using an Image Manifest as an Artifact Manifest, which is codified in the current v1.1.0-rc5 of OCI Image Spec. That said, I don't necessarily think this repo needs to remove Artifact Manifest just yet (maybe wait until v1.1.0 is officially released).

@waynr
Copy link
Contributor Author

waynr commented Sep 28, 2023

This was fixed in #145

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant