-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
About Datasets #9
Comments
Dear @M0ck4ry, Thank you for contacting us. In the datasets directory, we have outlined how the data is split for each dataset. For example, in the case of the PH2 dataset, the code specifies the split as follows:
This means the dataset split is not done randomly; it follows a predefined order as mentioned above. If you have any further questions or need additional clarification, please feel free to ask. |
Dear @bravo-hq , |
Dear @M0ck4ry, Could you please provide more details about the dataset you are working on and the specific changes you have made? This information will help us assist you more effectively. It's important to ensure that the pairs of images and labels remain together and are not mismatched. Sincerely, |
Dear @bravo-hq |
Thank you for your letter. I am only using the ISIC2018 dataset. The results obtained are similar to the paper, but the segmented images are not the sample images in the test set. I am not sure if it was a problem set by myself.
Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Hello, I noticed that in your code, the training and testing sets are placed in the same folder. So, during testing, a portion of the images are randomly selected for segmentation testing? Or will the last 100 images be used for testing? If you could reply, I would greatly appreciate it
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: