Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About Datasets #9

Open
M0ck4ry opened this issue Jun 21, 2024 · 7 comments
Open

About Datasets #9

M0ck4ry opened this issue Jun 21, 2024 · 7 comments
Assignees

Comments

@M0ck4ry
Copy link

M0ck4ry commented Jun 21, 2024

Hello, I noticed that in your code, the training and testing sets are placed in the same folder. So, during testing, a portion of the images are randomly selected for segmentation testing? Or will the last 100 images be used for testing? If you could reply, I would greatly appreciate it

@bravo-hq
Copy link
Collaborator

bravo-hq commented Jul 8, 2024

Dear @M0ck4ry,

Thank you for contacting us. In the datasets directory, we have outlined how the data is split for each dataset.

For example, in the case of the PH2 dataset, the code specifies the split as follows:

  • The first 80 images are used for training.
  • The next 20 images are used for validation.
  • The subsequent 100 images are used for testing.

This means the dataset split is not done randomly; it follows a predefined order as mentioned above.

If you have any further questions or need additional clarification, please feel free to ask.

Sincerely,
Yousef Sadegheih
image

@bravo-hq bravo-hq self-assigned this Jul 8, 2024
@M0ck4ry
Copy link
Author

M0ck4ry commented Jul 11, 2024

Dear @bravo-hq ,
Thank you for your reply. Yes, I noticed what you said. But I used 10 sample images for testing, the final segmentation corresponding to the original image is different from the 10 sample images I found. What is the reason for this? If I could receive your reply, I would greatly appreciate it

@bravo-hq
Copy link
Collaborator

Dear @M0ck4ry,

Could you please provide more details about the dataset you are working on and the specific changes you have made? This information will help us assist you more effectively. It's important to ensure that the pairs of images and labels remain together and are not mismatched.

Sincerely,
Yousef Sadegheih

@M0ck4ry
Copy link
Author

M0ck4ry commented Jul 11, 2024

Dear @bravo-hq
Thank you for your reply again. I tried to train with 80 images, validate with 10 images, and test with 9 images (these 99 images are located in a separate folder). It was found that the 9 images tested were completely different from the last 9 images in the previous dataset.Here are some screenshots and images of the files
The first image is the log section, and the second image is the generated result. I found that these 9 test images are completely different from the last 9 of the 99 images I set (i.e. the test set). Normally, im.png and gt.png should be identical to the previous pictures. But the result is not like that. I would greatly appreciate it if you could reply
{__MLVXEU SUKR(7HLNZYG3
3XW52 I0LQ_A)238SH7`GHI

@Burger-Z
Copy link

Does ISIC2016
dataset
dataset work on your code? Because ISIC2018 is too large and I cannot successfully download it.

@MilkTeaAddicted
Copy link

ISIC2016 数据集适用于您的代码吗?因为 ISIC2018 太大,我无法成功下载。 数据集

Hello, ISIC2016 is applicable; I ran his code and the results are almost identical to what is shown for ISIC2018 dataset in the paper.

@M0ck4ry
Copy link
Author

M0ck4ry commented Nov 18, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants