Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Verification of the details of the DAE-Former paper #14

Open
ai-JIE opened this issue Dec 9, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Verification of the details of the DAE-Former paper #14

ai-JIE opened this issue Dec 9, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@ai-JIE
Copy link

ai-JIE commented Dec 9, 2023

Hello Author, recently I have been doing research on medical image segmentation. For the dae article you wrote, I have the following doubts about the training strategy code for training isic data sets that you did not disclose, this part of the code is very important to me. When I tried to replicate it myself, it was much lower. Hope to get your reply.

@amirhossein-kz
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @ai-JIE,

For information regarding the training and evaluation code for the skin dataset, please refer to this link.

@ai-JIE
Copy link
Author

ai-JIE commented Dec 11, 2023

嗨,

有关皮肤数据集的训练和评估代码的信息,请参阅此链接
According to your suggestion, I replicated the experiment of DAE-Foremer's skin dataset and obtained a Dice-score of 0.86. I'm shocked.

@yangz9527
Copy link

嗨,
有关皮肤数据集的训练和评估代码的信息,请参阅此链接
According to your suggestion, I replicated the experiment of DAE-Foremer's skin dataset and obtained a Dice-score of 0.86. I'm shocked.

Hello, may I ask how you reproduced the results on the ISIC dataset? I tried to reproduce the results on the ISIC dataset but failed

@ZBWKHH
Copy link

ZBWKHH commented Apr 19, 2024

嗨,
有关皮肤数据集的训练和评估代码的信息,请参阅此链接
According to your suggestion, I replicated the experiment of DAE-Foremer's skin dataset and obtained a Dice-score of 0.86. I'm shocked.

Hello, may I ask how you reproduced the results on the ISIC dataset? I tried to reproduce the results on the ISIC dataset but failed

When I used the ISIC2018 dataset, referring to the link provided by the author, DSC obtained 85.7

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants