Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: implement memory transaction #702

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 10, 2024

Conversation

bsbds
Copy link
Collaborator

@bsbds bsbds commented Mar 18, 2024

Depends-On: #674

Please briefly answer these questions:

  • what problem are you trying to solve? (or if there's no problem, what's the motivation for this change?)

    Implement txn API for memory engine.

  • what changes does this pull request make?

  • are there any non-obvious implications of these changes? (does it break compatibility with previous versions, etc)

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 18, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 20.56075% with 85 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 75.32%. Comparing base (e35b35a) to head (fe77c41).
Report is 48 commits behind head on master.

Files Patch % Lines
crates/engine/src/memory_engine/transaction.rs 13.40% 82 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
crates/engine/src/memory_engine/mod.rs 90.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #702      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   75.55%   75.32%   -0.24%     
==========================================
  Files         180      187       +7     
  Lines       26938    27665     +727     
  Branches    26938    27665     +727     
==========================================
+ Hits        20353    20838     +485     
- Misses       5366     5542     +176     
- Partials     1219     1285      +66     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@bsbds bsbds marked this pull request as ready for review March 18, 2024 02:22
Copy link

mergify bot commented Apr 18, 2024

@bsbds Your PR is in conflict and cannot be merged.

@mergify mergify bot requested a review from a team April 19, 2024 04:36
@bsbds bsbds force-pushed the impl-memory-transaction branch from 7feeffa to 8ccf23b Compare April 22, 2024 07:10
Copy link

mergify bot commented Apr 22, 2024

@bsbds Convert your pr to draft since CI failed

@mergify mergify bot marked this pull request as draft April 22, 2024 07:14
@bsbds bsbds marked this pull request as ready for review April 25, 2024 02:30
@mergify mergify bot marked this pull request as draft April 25, 2024 02:30
@bsbds bsbds marked this pull request as ready for review April 25, 2024 02:58
@mergify mergify bot marked this pull request as draft April 25, 2024 02:59
@Phoenix500526
Copy link
Collaborator

@Mergifyio rebase

Copy link

mergify bot commented Apr 25, 2024

rebase

✅ Branch has been successfully rebased

@Phoenix500526 Phoenix500526 force-pushed the impl-memory-transaction branch from 8ccf23b to d7813f9 Compare April 25, 2024 15:03
@bsbds bsbds force-pushed the impl-memory-transaction branch from d7813f9 to df8a6da Compare April 26, 2024 02:41
@bsbds bsbds marked this pull request as ready for review April 26, 2024 02:41
@bsbds bsbds force-pushed the impl-memory-transaction branch from df8a6da to fe77c41 Compare April 29, 2024 06:18
@mergify mergify bot requested a review from a team May 8, 2024 08:03
@mergify mergify bot requested a review from a team May 9, 2024 01:31
Copy link
Collaborator

@Phoenix500526 Phoenix500526 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mergify mergify bot requested a review from a team May 10, 2024 01:22
@Phoenix500526 Phoenix500526 merged commit 6713407 into xline-kv:master May 10, 2024
12 of 14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants