feat: Instrument await using await-tree

[Harsh1s]

• what problem are you trying to solve? (or if there's no problem, what's the motivation for this change?)
  -> FIxes [Feature]: Instrument the execution path of the command (i.e. fast_path or slow_path) #580
  -> Currently, some simple information is logged to display the execution path of the command. This uses more detailed information to show this process (i.e. use await-tree to indicate the duration of each await.).

• what changes does this pull request make?
  -> Makes use of instrument_await within functions annotated with the #[instrument] macro to add more detailed async tracing.

• are there any non-obvious implications of these changes? (does it break compatibility with previous versions, etc)
  -> No

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 75.71429% with 17 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 74.59%. Comparing base (e35b35a) to head (16ae376).
Report is 70 commits behind head on master.

❗ Current head 16ae376 differs from pull request most recent head 86ea780. Consider uploading reports for the commit 86ea780 to get more accurate results

Files	Patch %	Lines
crates/curp/src/server/mod.rs	69.44%	9 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
crates/xline/src/server/kv_server.rs	33.33%	5 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #682      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   75.55%   74.59%   -0.96%     
==========================================
  Files         180      172       -8     
  Lines       26938    25342    -1596     
  Branches    26938    25342    -1596     
==========================================
- Hits        20353    18904    -1449     
+ Misses       5366     5270      -96     
+ Partials     1219     1168      -51     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Phoenix500526]

Will this modification affect performance in any way? I suggest adding a switch here so that we can enable it as needed.

[Harsh1s]

Will this modification affect performance in any way? I suggest adding a switch here so that we can enable it as needed.

Sure, I'll make the changes and let you know. Thanks!

[iGxnon]

Can you provide an example after running it?

There are no relevant performance tests.

[mergify]

@Harsh1s Your PR is in conflict and cannot be merged.

[Phoenix500526]

Hi, @Harsh1s ! This pr has been stalled for 3 weeks. Would you like to update it? 😄

[Harsh1s]

Hi, @Harsh1s ! This pr has been stalled for 3 weeks. Would you like to update it? 😄

Oh I'm really sorry about the stalling, it's been a busy past month at my uni, a lot of tests and project deadlines. My end semester exams are going on currently too. I'll try to update it within a week for sure. Sorry again!

[rogercloud]

The latest version is "0.2.1", would you please update it?

[rogercloud]

The same as above.