-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add community detection algorithms #604
Comments
Just to get the ball rolling, I have been looking at what the other libraries have about this. HGX
HypernetX
Which ones do we want to implement? Do we have a priority list or something of the kind? |
I would go first for the most "basic" and standard one. And by standard I mean if not standard in hypergraphs yet, that its potential analogue in graphs is standard. Bonus points if it's not the slowest. Any idea which one would fit? For example I like the mixed-membership ones, but maybe mixed-membership is already kind of more advanced? |
I think Louvain-style algorithm would be simplest. In fact, I was hoping to implement the Kaminski et al. paper at one point: https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04816. Maybe this is a good place to start? |
mmm yes... modularity and link communities (allows for mixed memberships on the nodes @maximelucas ) should be quite easy to implement and relatively fast... about the standard question, it depends on who you ask (aaaargh). |
but yeah, I guess we can have them... if no one calls dibs I can work on it. |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: