Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request:Update PD290 Mode #22

Closed
idontcfr23Q opened this issue Jul 30, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed

Request:Update PD290 Mode #22

idontcfr23Q opened this issue Jul 30, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@idontcfr23Q
Copy link

It will be much more convenient if it is added.

@xdsopl
Copy link
Owner

xdsopl commented Jul 30, 2024

Convenient to whom? Leaving out PD290 was a design decision. Re-adding will take more of my time, which is inconvenient to me.

@ZeroWolf233
Copy link

Convenient to whom? Leaving out PD290 was a design decision. Re-adding will take more of my time, which is inconvenient to me.

at least it convenient me, i really need PD290 Mode, if you like, maybe i can help you to re-add it and maintain it

@xdsopl
Copy link
Owner

xdsopl commented Nov 24, 2024

I've added experimental PD290 on Friday. To keep aspect ratio and not to make things worse for the other modes, the preview in the scope is cut to 640 pixels horizontally. The stored image has full 800 x 616 resolution tho.

@ZeroWolf233
Copy link

I've added experimental PD290 on Friday. To keep aspect ratio and not to make things worse for the other modes, the preview in the scope is cut to 640 pixels horizontally. The stored image has full 800 x 616 resolution tho.

that's really OK, i can stand it

@xdsopl
Copy link
Owner

xdsopl commented Nov 24, 2024

It is possible to squeeze the 800 pixels into the 640 pixels of the scope, so at least you would see the whole image but it would look odd. I will look into it some other time.

@xdsopl xdsopl closed this as completed Nov 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants