You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Below are some suggestions for updates to the Reviewer Checklist for "new pathway submission" PRs.
This assumes that it's possible to have different check lists for "new" and "updated" PRs
The proposed new language for each item in the checklist is in the style of a task. I'm not sure if this is helpful, open to feedback.
Reviewers can refer to the Automated Testing section to see results of automated tests, and maybe also some output from specific tests? For example, for the data node annotation test can we include a list of data nodes (node labels) with failed database lookup?
Some items reference tests that don't exist yet, so I made up numbers.
Reviewer Checklist
Review the pathway title for relevance to the pathway content.
Review the description for relevance to the pathway content, completeness and grammar.
Review data node annotations: see incomplete node annotations under Automated Testing, test 5 results.
Review interactions: see unconnected interactions under Automated Testing, test 6 results.
Review source references for relevance.
Review ontology terms for relevance.
Review pathway diagram layout and style.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Below are some suggestions for updates to the Reviewer Checklist for "new pathway submission" PRs.
Reviewer Checklist
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: